freedom of expression. Author: Abab-Din Date: 03/04/2008 11:46:38 Revolution or Restoration?
With all my heart whole body All consciousness - Hear the Revolution. A. Block Student: In the dialog "The ruling class got confused," You said that among the consistent Marxists today do not have these great personalities who could lead a socialist revolution in Russia. So, where to look for a person? Indeed, perhaps the conversion, as you say, "Saul to Paul? Ababii-Din:" This idea has been repeatedly expressed by our political scientists. A young and talented economist G. Delyagin, being, in his words, "consistent and seems to be an enemy Putin's relentless, always has a possibility of destroying the unlikely event of Putinism Putin himself. He writes: "Given the personal ability to Putin, the hardness of his personal convictions (which he changed to judge by his biography, at least three times - during the transition to democracy KGB Sobchak, then serving an oligarchy Trade the Yeltsin era, and Finally, the destruction of the latter during the transition to owning his own country, the power of the oligarchy), and the ability to imitate, it can be assumed, and changes very unlikely that the destruction of Putinism Putin himself. It is true that the law on the scale corresponds to Lenin's New Economic Policy War Communism substitution or release of political prisoners loyal ally of Stalin, Khrushchev, and requires an appropriate scale of personality "(G. Delyagin Retribution on your door The revolution in Russia. When how, why, Mr., 2007?. S. 337.). A friend of Mikhail Kalashnikov Maksim Delyagin political scientist asking this question more clearly and strongly: "You can not prevent a revolution - the leader" (Quote from: .. Ibid, p. 18). Students: What is the relevance today, the socialist revolution in Russia? Ababii-Din: The Second Socialist Revolution, and knock on doors and windows in modern Russia. is only mediocre politicians and ordinary citizens do not feel it. Words of Alexander Blok, given highlighted, as relevant today as in 1917 as in 1917, the national liberation revolution in Russia is closer to the right and left. According Moskovsky Komsomolets, a former member of the Legislative Assembly of St. Petersburg, Sergei Gulyaev and vice-president Alex Yabloko bulk created a new opposition to the project "Russian National Liberation Movement" (The People) (Premiership Putin - ? A bluff or reality / Moskovsky Komsomolets. 2008. January 22.). The second Russian revolution, apparently, will not only be a socialist, but at the same time of national liberation. In the case of natural speech people will achieve social justice and national levels. State, where the main subject is a thief and not a manufacturer of production, can not long exist, it is not sustainable by definition. The country, which is controlled from the ocean, the long downtime. Aware of this, people today is liberation not only close to the social life, but even in front of him. Students: Judging by your statements, the leader able to lead a movement of people for social justice and national, on the horizon is not visible. Among Marxists, such a person is not present. When the same people may find the leader, capable of bringing to win a modern national liberation and socialist revolution in Russia? Ababii-Din: In the political battlefield. Among those currently in Russia suffered the most devastating political defeat, even if it may be unknown to himself and his clique. Students: Who is with us today suffered the most devastating political defeat? Ababii-Din: "Our President. If you have heard his voice and seen the face of Vladimir Putin during his New Year's wishes on December 31, 2007, you will agree with me: this is not politics winner and a loser, which is really only one way - retirement - and the lives of individuals person in the family. This speech showed almost all the chains in the country, apparently in order to breathe strength chest pyatidesyatipyatiletnego "seniors." But it turned out quite the contrary. He was absent and the Cathedral of Christ the Saviour in the night of 6 January 7, 2008, seeking, apparently, more distant and better protected of political turmoil and passions of residence. We have already cited the example of Alexander I and Fyodor Kuzmich ... Russia to withdraw voluntarily the authorities to take off the political career without inner spiritual anguish can not. Nicolas Alexander I and II patients were sick of the dynasty. But Putin - a healthy person, which is well beaten and left and right. And in Russia for two broken unbeaten give. Student: Where beaten policy could assemble a new team of supporters? Ababii-Din: In its past and the present. Unfortunately, we do not know enough about either one. Every eight years, it was beautiful clever plot, no worse than Stalin, hiding their true purpose. newspapers, both here and abroad, often asked the question: Who is Vladimir Putin? And while it there is no clear answer, although she has written over two hundred books and thousands of articles. Who is he? Communist who, in his words, are stored in a post that part? Liberal, often speak of freedom? Democrat who care about the supreme power of the people? In Russia today there is a struggle between two major ideologies - patriotism and cosmopolitanism. But we do not know what belongs in the heart of our President, who reads the Bible in a plane. When we say that a man should be judged not by words but by deeds, they mean an ordinary person. And the intelligence professional can not be properly judged not only by him but by his actions. Familiar this law, journalists, scouts magazine "Time" in an interview Dec. 12, 2007, the full version what appeared on the Internet, have sought to expose the soul of our president. But in vain. They were able to succeed here, if Putin went to school every Western intelligence services. But Putin is a student of Russian and Soviet intelligence, and sophisticated methods of intelligence "Time", he skillfully avoided, and most important about him after the interview, they know no more before the interview. He tells here personal qualities Putin talented German journalist and a good scout, a good judge of political and people, Peter Scholl-Latour: "Do not expect to moral evaluations, or even psychological analysis of Vladimir Putin. I have not fallen to look in his eyes as I watched in the eyes of George W. Bush, then making the necessary conclusions on the naivete of the terrible U.S. president. 24 years in the KGB, Putin was able to obtain not only a black belt in judo, but enter the Science prying hide their thoughts and feelings, and, if necessary, even to outwit the lie detector "(Scholl-Latour P., Putin's Russia:. The effect of compression empire under pressure from NATO, China and Islam, M., 2007 S. 195 -... 196). But if so, to thwart journalists "Time" it was not worth much effort. Journalists Scouts "Time" saw in Putin a politician, what they wanted, and came to the conclusion that in the Year of the Rat Vladimir Putin escapes from a ship of the Russian State, handing the wheel to the designated successor of Davos, which is tied to Russia aboard the U.S. battleship and to storm the Chinese warship. Such developments after March 2 is likely. But it is not predetermined. And this uncertainty is largely dependent on Putin's personality and behavior. Students: What's Vladimir Putin may be a surprise to our neighbors across the sea? Ababii-Din: It is possible to agree with the fact that journalists are "Time" written on the cover of their magazine: "Vladimir Putin. The new King of Russia" But today we do can not say with confidence that he is king, and what faith is: the king, or a cosmopolitan city, which was Alexander I and Nicolas II, the king or the patriot as he was Ivan the Terrible and Joseph Stalin and how he wants to see people of Russia. The relationship between Putin and Medvedev today resemble the relations of Ivan the Terrible and kasimskogo Bekbulatovich king Simeon. In 1574, suddenly around Ivan the Terrible Simeon proclaimed "King of All the Russias", settled in the Kremlin and began to call themselves princes of Moscow, called derogatory Ivashko. According to historians, all that was needed comedy from Ivan IV to justify his anger against the boyars. Being a true master of the Russian land in 1575 Ivan the Terrible moved into the city women seniors formed a new army to take action against Oprichny undesirables boyars terrible punishment. Consequently, there was a change of elites in power and strengthen the centralized Russian state. Stalin in 1934, without taking any public position, and not even a secretary general, and just being one of the secretaries of the CPSU (b), has become the true master of the Soviet state in 1937 and 1939. replaced by a pro-Western elite cosmopolitan patriot who saved Russia from defeat in the Second World War. The same Mao Zedong did something during the Cultural Revolution, the strengthening of the young socialist state. But the change of the ruling elite during the Leninist revolution - is too well known thing to talk about it here. Students: Do you think that in Russia there is the need to change the ruling elite? Ababii-Din: "Not only late, but he and" mature ". is one of the main political tasks of the Russian Revolution. Marxist communism and capitalism, Yeltsin - the two vectors of the same strength, of Western origin and the anti-Russian destructive. The peak is the consumption Marxist communism oligarchy political parties held by the appropriation and redistribution of the wealth produced by the people. The peak of the Yeltsin unbridled capitalism is the financial oligarchy and also held usurious commercial redistribution and ownership of the results of the work of others. And in both cases, all power is concentrated in the hands of not producing, and assigns, a class of parasites. Russian man can sometimes feed and the two generals, but to feed two Abramovich, now the Americans want, he is physically unable to. Therefore, Russia and found ourselves short in its ranks at one million dollars per year. Strategy Yeltsin as a strategy of Marxism, is not entirely constructive and destructive. The main error Putin for eight years of his reign is that it is only slightly mitigated the devastating poison Yeltsin, but not rid the country of consumption of opium. But sooner or later the truth comes out. Today, scientists have discovered, even such a fact, how the poison had been poisoned by Stalin. The poison, that poison the Russian people for 20 years, too, sooner or later discovered. And people, if at that time remain self-preservation, casts their shoulders parasitic social classes and their political parties. says the well-known actor and director, artistic director of Theatre "actors Commonwealth Taganka Nikolai Gubenko," people over time, maturation, and rallied to the solution of their own destiny, will find all its power "(quoted from: Arguments and Facts ... 2007 № 32 C 3 ..). Student: How do you envision the development prospects of Russia? Ababii-Din: "Objectively, Russia for positive social development is now only two ways - the Leninist revolution and Stalinist restoration. All other paths lead to an impasse and further exacerbate the situation in the camp - being pushed to the state, civilization and nothingness demographic time great Russia. rebirth of Russia begins with the rebirth of socialism with a human face, with the creation of human civilization in Russia of a new type of socialism. is the only real way to the rebirth of Russia. All other means are not only unpleasant, but the disappearance of the wreckage of the Soviet and Russian civilization. Student: And you believe that Vladimir Putin ("new Russian tsar, as the" Time ") can cause a type of revolution Leninist or Stalinist restoration? Ababii-Din: At least in theory, it can be excluded. Putin could become the same "true" disciple of Lenin, which was Stalin, who has over 20 years to restore the Russian tradition of political relations. Putin, like Stalin, not a revolutionary and a reformer. It is to restore traditional relations of Russian socio-economic development. Yeltsin made a coup against-revolutionary: to destroy the Soviet state, he would not even begun the restoration of traditional Russian social and economic relations, leaving Putin amerikanopodobny unbridled capitalism without the American worker . Instead, he came merchants, lenders, the oligarchs, corrupt officials, corruption and make informokraty "elite" new ruling class, skin robbed the Russian people. For eight years, Putin has taken the first steps towards restoring the Russian state Russian and traditional socio-economic relations, which are essentially socialist. And in these circumstances to make the wrong hands the rudder of the ship of the Russian state - worse than the crime. is a strategic mistake that will lead to the collapse of the Russian state, but also the death of the peoples of Russia and of Russian culture. It is no coincidence, seeing that the enemies of error, internal and external Russia are cheering and pushing the president to ensure that he insisted on his error. But it can and fix it. Take the helm of the ship of state to the new Lzhedmitrija or Simeon, Putin could make restoration or revolutionary revolution from above. If leaders of the ruling class is not smart enough to follow this issue Terrible Ivan Castro, Stalin, Mao Zedong, Deng Xiaoping, Raul, the revolution will start from the bottom, with consequences far more serious State and Russian peoples of the Russian ruling class. Student: But why do you think that such a revolution from above or restoration will not be able to commit, Dmitri Medvedev, as president? Ababii-Din: revolution from above can make a natural born sovereign, such as Amenhotep IV of Egypt, who took the name Akhenaten after the coup, Ivan IV of Russia, called after the coup, the Terrible, Peter the Great, called the father of the fatherland, or the person which the dominant power in the nation and their environment, like Stalin in the USSR. In the 1930's. formally equal to Stalin after the order has been Kaganovich, Kirov, Zhdanov and other secretaries of the Central Committee of the CPSU (b), but none of them could not have done what I did that Georgians Russified . And history acquired him, even if scientists prove Finally, he sacrificed his friend, the Kirov and many others. And now, here's how! Raised a national leader - and the landfill. Eight years of friends and enemies have worked on the authority of Vladimir Putin, has written many books on him, and now he would just throw this waste capital is not used for the construction of a sovereign Russia as an independent power center. Descendants of us do not understand and was convicted of political profligacy. Put on store shelves, libraries, over two hundred pounds, which raises the authority of Vladimir Putin, was appointed a national leader, a man, and even the Tsar of Russia was confused, made a prey "Time" and west of the capital loan shark, which does not focus on the mind of our President and his pro-Western sense, brought the facts of Western culture with which he faced while working in Germany of espionage . But all is not lost! The people have the right not to convince, and to require the application of his leadership of faithful service to the interests of the country in which it was high level of national leadership. Student: It turns out that the departure of Vladimir Putin of the Russian loses big-time political weapon, it was equipped to face their opponents? Ababii-Din: Yes. But it may be even worse if he had these weapons are used against those who armed, as well as by the KGB, which helped to destroy the state and productive forces of the USSR in 1991 Russia today has come back a revolutionary situation, and it is either will result in the Second Russian National Liberation and socialist revolution, or at the end of the collapse of Russia, compared with which the destruction of the Soviet Union seems a school prank. Student: What are the external factors contributing to the maturation of a revolutionary situation in Russia, which aggravates the situation inside the country? Ababii-Din: The global crisis of capitalism and usury of the U.S. dollar collapse predatory social system. "This crisis is not only economic but also the nature of civilization in general ... The total debt issues in the U.S. economy, rising to 50 trillion dollars today, which is about four and a half years of official annual U.S. GDP ... it is more and more, with a rate of 10% per year. This sometimes exceeds the growth rate and U.S. and global economy. is the main indicator of the severity of the crisis ... The global crisis could happen in two weeks. May occur within six months. May occur within two years. But over the next five years, it almost always happens with a probability of 99% (Khazin M. The global crisis and Russia / / Tomorrow. 2008. № 1. S. 1, 2) .. Students: What do you see the main danger of this crisis for Russia? Ababii-Din: The main danger in the absence of real sovereignty of the Russian economic, political and information in its dependence on Western capital usurer in all - from bread to ballpoint pens. "The main problem in Russia today is that its economy is not self-sufficient. Unlike, say, the Soviet economy. The Soviet economy, even if it is completely block imports into the country could offer its citizens a minimum level of food clothing, housing and so on. Today, we are unable to afford food, even "(Ibid. S. 2.). But more important even in it, and that the ruling class in Russia today ' Today is not interested, to create self-supporting economy. But "if Russia will not be an independent center of power, it will inevitably disintegrate. United States can not by a small comprador, hated by the population of the leaders in Moscow to retain much of the area. Therefore, all east of the Urals, fall the hands of China. Semi- be directly included in its territory, it will be partially used. And if so, China is clearly emerging as first among equals in the world of geopolitics, not everyone agreed. In most of China "(ibid.) .. Students: What do you see the reason that the "ruling class of today's Russia is not interested, to create self-supporting economy? Ababii-din: And it ' is a question of questions. Part of the answer given in the article quoted Michael Khazin, in which he writes: "Russia is today - a huge area with vast resources, which is completely absent from the national elite. In general, as a sort of - no. In the division of the world ... Russia as independent centers of power today, not ... if we start to do in Russia, "power center", we need an independent Russian elite, the current system of governance does not exist. Anyone who tried to defend the national interests of the country since the early 90's with an iron hand by the government scrapped. Everything. And under Putin, too "(ibid.) .. Students: Do you think this statement Mr. Khazinah true? Ababii-din: I think it is compatible. Cruelly dumped and continue to throw all person trying to "defend the national interests of the country, from three complementary main power structures - political, economic, informational. And this happened not only under Yeltsin and Putin, but from Khrushchev. Do not go into a long-standing Soviet times, have a look at the past two decades. When President Congress of Russian Communities, a patriot of Russia V. Skokov? When the Attorney General of consciousness A. Kazannik? How clever SY Glazyev, who as minister would be proud of every civilized nation? When the former Minister of Culture of Russia ev patriot S. Mix? If a naive patriot General Lebed IA? When fierce patriot, General Alexander M. Makashov? When playwright VS pink? When the former chairman of the committee print, BS Mironov zetetic? Where writer-patriot MF Antonov? When well-known economist who specializes in traditional Russian economy and prolific Russian writer-writer AO Platonov? When the Attorney General Skuratov Yu, who in the modern civilized could play the role of the famous Skuratov Malyuta? When SN Semanov patriot, 40 years of struggle for national interests of Russia? When the historian and patriot, IY Froyanov? If a talented writer Yuri Mukhin, for 20 years against usurious economics for development of production, the productive economy in Russia? If excellent organizer, writer, historian and specialist in social strategy Podberyozkin AI? When the singer EV lemon Bolshevik national socialism? When the leader of the party "Rodina" Dmitry Rogozin? Many voiced singer of authoritarianism and democracy AA Prokhanov barely afloat. For how long? How many tens and even hundreds of ardent defender of national interests of Russia? They did not really in the current "elite". Nicholas Zenkovich in "Encyclopedia of Putin" gives nearly 400 personalities and nearly by far the president of Russia. There's even a paper on child-owner of Putin's puppy, but there's hardly anyone over the name. Judging by this encyclopedia, for Putin, it is appropriate words of the famous song: "you have to turn left - turn right." Students: What was the result of a "right" rotation? Ababii-Din: In this issue Mr. Khazin answers in the article cited above. Therefore, the selection of the ruling class of people who are not interested in defending national interests, in fact, there were an elite anti-national. It includes "people who now represent the interests of the West in Russia ... It kleptomany facing west. Their children do not live in Russia, many even do not speak Russian. They will inevitably inevitably weaken our country - which was nice to live in retirement in a "civilized" countries "(ibid.) .. If the authorities continue to remain in the hands of an "elite", the song, it will soon be sung. Students: Speak maturation of a revolutionary situation in Russia, you name Putin as a possible leader of the socialist revolution imminent. But he expects that Mr. Putin, if the revolution did not happen or if it fails to take this opportunity? Ababii-Din: One of two things. Either by leading a socialist revolution from above, it will restore the country socialist revolutionary and life will become popular leader in Russia, the first person and in fact and in form. Either permanently cede their positions to the west and rossiyanskim lenders and leave politics and history, ended her life abroad somewhere simple living and shivering in their millions. Money raised by the unfair labor, deprived of moral and spiritual values, but nobody brought neither happiness nor peace. Putin can live a long life, like Kerensky. It is no coincidence that it is two hours per day for the sport. But for history and for myself, as Kerensky, it is always a loser. Third, apparently, is not given. course, besides the desire to fight for his vocation to be the leader of the people and the savior of Russia needed the will and mental capacity, consistent with the objectives level. This about this writing the President of the Presidium, scientific director of the Institute of Globalization Problems, a famous Russian economist and politician MG Delyagin, considering the question of unification of Russia with the Kazakhstan and Belarus: "It seems that Nazarbaev Lukashenka and his strong will and intellectual qualities than Putin, which makes it very probable loss in the competition vnutriapparatnoy natural in a single state. If we recall that Lukashenko and Nazarbayev quite convincingly demonstrate a deep interest in their country and their ability to achieve real, not false, there is a risk that in the case of a significant association of the population of Russia would prefer to find a Head of State is not "clean" Did and "alien" or Nazarbaev Lukashenka (MG Delyagin Retribution on your door The revolution in Russia. when, how, why, Mr., 2007 S. 257? ..). Student: Perhaps this fact is the reason for the departure of Vladimir Putin's policy? Ababii-Din: In terms of capacity mental, Stalin was less than their rivals, but to defeat them. And even that turned into a lack of dignity. And it's not so much the spirit of the leaders of Belarus and Kazakhstan has allowed these states to be higher than Russia in terms of socio-political patriotism and an almost Stalinist in touch with their people. For this reason, "in the modernization of the elite, not to mention the socio-economic, Kazakhstan has surpassed Russia so degraded that it poses to the point of direct reference and immediate "(ibid.. S. 356.). Add to this the fact that Kazakhstan has retained many socialist institutions in management, science, education, medicine, and a steady increase in population, Putin does not have much to learn from Nazarbayev. Students: Does Putin get rid of Yeltsin's legacy? Ababii-Din: "Judging by his speech to the Council of State February 8, 2008, shall, if he wishes strongly. Contrary to the interview on December 12 magazine" Time ", where he sang praises Yeltsin, February 8, he began to criticize Yeltsin's policy of 90-s:. "Russia itself had become a patchwork of territories. Most regions had laws that contradicted the Russian Constitution. Some examples were simply outrageous ... the status of individual territories defined as" a sovereign state associated with the Russian Federation. " Legal provisions have been established under land claims regions held against each other territories ... such dispute, in fact, we have over two thousand. " Maybe the ice was broken and began movement to the maxim of Julius Caesar. "Better to be first in the village and the second in Rome" There remains only the question of what Putin will choose - for better or for worse? February 14, 2008
With all my heart whole body All consciousness - Hear the Revolution. A. Block Student: In the dialog "The ruling class got confused," You said that among the consistent Marxists today do not have these great personalities who could lead a socialist revolution in Russia. So, where to look for a person? Indeed, perhaps the conversion, as you say, "Saul to Paul? Ababii-Din:" This idea has been repeatedly expressed by our political scientists. A young and talented economist G. Delyagin, being, in his words, "consistent and seems to be an enemy Putin's relentless, always has a possibility of destroying the unlikely event of Putinism Putin himself. He writes: "Given the personal ability to Putin, the hardness of his personal convictions (which he changed to judge by his biography, at least three times - during the transition to democracy KGB Sobchak, then serving an oligarchy Trade the Yeltsin era, and Finally, the destruction of the latter during the transition to owning his own country, the power of the oligarchy), and the ability to imitate, it can be assumed, and changes very unlikely that the destruction of Putinism Putin himself. It is true that the law on the scale corresponds to Lenin's New Economic Policy War Communism substitution or release of political prisoners loyal ally of Stalin, Khrushchev, and requires an appropriate scale of personality "(G. Delyagin Retribution on your door The revolution in Russia. When how, why, Mr., 2007?. S. 337.). A friend of Mikhail Kalashnikov Maksim Delyagin political scientist asking this question more clearly and strongly: "You can not prevent a revolution - the leader" (Quote from: .. Ibid, p. 18). Students: What is the relevance today, the socialist revolution in Russia? Ababii-Din: The Second Socialist Revolution, and knock on doors and windows in modern Russia. is only mediocre politicians and ordinary citizens do not feel it. Words of Alexander Blok, given highlighted, as relevant today as in 1917 as in 1917, the national liberation revolution in Russia is closer to the right and left. According Moskovsky Komsomolets, a former member of the Legislative Assembly of St. Petersburg, Sergei Gulyaev and vice-president Alex Yabloko bulk created a new opposition to the project "Russian National Liberation Movement" (The People) (Premiership Putin - ? A bluff or reality / Moskovsky Komsomolets. 2008. January 22.). The second Russian revolution, apparently, will not only be a socialist, but at the same time of national liberation. In the case of natural speech people will achieve social justice and national levels. State, where the main subject is a thief and not a manufacturer of production, can not long exist, it is not sustainable by definition. The country, which is controlled from the ocean, the long downtime. Aware of this, people today is liberation not only close to the social life, but even in front of him. Students: Judging by your statements, the leader able to lead a movement of people for social justice and national, on the horizon is not visible. Among Marxists, such a person is not present. When the same people may find the leader, capable of bringing to win a modern national liberation and socialist revolution in Russia? Ababii-Din: In the political battlefield. Among those currently in Russia suffered the most devastating political defeat, even if it may be unknown to himself and his clique. Students: Who is with us today suffered the most devastating political defeat? Ababii-Din: "Our President. If you have heard his voice and seen the face of Vladimir Putin during his New Year's wishes on December 31, 2007, you will agree with me: this is not politics winner and a loser, which is really only one way - retirement - and the lives of individuals person in the family. This speech showed almost all the chains in the country, apparently in order to breathe strength chest pyatidesyatipyatiletnego "seniors." But it turned out quite the contrary. He was absent and the Cathedral of Christ the Saviour in the night of 6 January 7, 2008, seeking, apparently, more distant and better protected of political turmoil and passions of residence. We have already cited the example of Alexander I and Fyodor Kuzmich ... Russia to withdraw voluntarily the authorities to take off the political career without inner spiritual anguish can not. Nicolas Alexander I and II patients were sick of the dynasty. But Putin - a healthy person, which is well beaten and left and right. And in Russia for two broken unbeaten give. Student: Where beaten policy could assemble a new team of supporters? Ababii-Din: In its past and the present. Unfortunately, we do not know enough about either one. Every eight years, it was beautiful clever plot, no worse than Stalin, hiding their true purpose. newspapers, both here and abroad, often asked the question: Who is Vladimir Putin? And while it there is no clear answer, although she has written over two hundred books and thousands of articles. Who is he? Communist who, in his words, are stored in a post that part? Liberal, often speak of freedom? Democrat who care about the supreme power of the people? In Russia today there is a struggle between two major ideologies - patriotism and cosmopolitanism. But we do not know what belongs in the heart of our President, who reads the Bible in a plane. When we say that a man should be judged not by words but by deeds, they mean an ordinary person. And the intelligence professional can not be properly judged not only by him but by his actions. Familiar this law, journalists, scouts magazine "Time" in an interview Dec. 12, 2007, the full version what appeared on the Internet, have sought to expose the soul of our president. But in vain. They were able to succeed here, if Putin went to school every Western intelligence services. But Putin is a student of Russian and Soviet intelligence, and sophisticated methods of intelligence "Time", he skillfully avoided, and most important about him after the interview, they know no more before the interview. He tells here personal qualities Putin talented German journalist and a good scout, a good judge of political and people, Peter Scholl-Latour: "Do not expect to moral evaluations, or even psychological analysis of Vladimir Putin. I have not fallen to look in his eyes as I watched in the eyes of George W. Bush, then making the necessary conclusions on the naivete of the terrible U.S. president. 24 years in the KGB, Putin was able to obtain not only a black belt in judo, but enter the Science prying hide their thoughts and feelings, and, if necessary, even to outwit the lie detector "(Scholl-Latour P., Putin's Russia:. The effect of compression empire under pressure from NATO, China and Islam, M., 2007 S. 195 -... 196). But if so, to thwart journalists "Time" it was not worth much effort. Journalists Scouts "Time" saw in Putin a politician, what they wanted, and came to the conclusion that in the Year of the Rat Vladimir Putin escapes from a ship of the Russian State, handing the wheel to the designated successor of Davos, which is tied to Russia aboard the U.S. battleship and to storm the Chinese warship. Such developments after March 2 is likely. But it is not predetermined. And this uncertainty is largely dependent on Putin's personality and behavior. Students: What's Vladimir Putin may be a surprise to our neighbors across the sea? Ababii-Din: It is possible to agree with the fact that journalists are "Time" written on the cover of their magazine: "Vladimir Putin. The new King of Russia" But today we do can not say with confidence that he is king, and what faith is: the king, or a cosmopolitan city, which was Alexander I and Nicolas II, the king or the patriot as he was Ivan the Terrible and Joseph Stalin and how he wants to see people of Russia. The relationship between Putin and Medvedev today resemble the relations of Ivan the Terrible and kasimskogo Bekbulatovich king Simeon. In 1574, suddenly around Ivan the Terrible Simeon proclaimed "King of All the Russias", settled in the Kremlin and began to call themselves princes of Moscow, called derogatory Ivashko. According to historians, all that was needed comedy from Ivan IV to justify his anger against the boyars. Being a true master of the Russian land in 1575 Ivan the Terrible moved into the city women seniors formed a new army to take action against Oprichny undesirables boyars terrible punishment. Consequently, there was a change of elites in power and strengthen the centralized Russian state. Stalin in 1934, without taking any public position, and not even a secretary general, and just being one of the secretaries of the CPSU (b), has become the true master of the Soviet state in 1937 and 1939. replaced by a pro-Western elite cosmopolitan patriot who saved Russia from defeat in the Second World War. The same Mao Zedong did something during the Cultural Revolution, the strengthening of the young socialist state. But the change of the ruling elite during the Leninist revolution - is too well known thing to talk about it here. Students: Do you think that in Russia there is the need to change the ruling elite? Ababii-Din: "Not only late, but he and" mature ". is one of the main political tasks of the Russian Revolution. Marxist communism and capitalism, Yeltsin - the two vectors of the same strength, of Western origin and the anti-Russian destructive. The peak is the consumption Marxist communism oligarchy political parties held by the appropriation and redistribution of the wealth produced by the people. The peak of the Yeltsin unbridled capitalism is the financial oligarchy and also held usurious commercial redistribution and ownership of the results of the work of others. And in both cases, all power is concentrated in the hands of not producing, and assigns, a class of parasites. Russian man can sometimes feed and the two generals, but to feed two Abramovich, now the Americans want, he is physically unable to. Therefore, Russia and found ourselves short in its ranks at one million dollars per year. Strategy Yeltsin as a strategy of Marxism, is not entirely constructive and destructive. The main error Putin for eight years of his reign is that it is only slightly mitigated the devastating poison Yeltsin, but not rid the country of consumption of opium. But sooner or later the truth comes out. Today, scientists have discovered, even such a fact, how the poison had been poisoned by Stalin. The poison, that poison the Russian people for 20 years, too, sooner or later discovered. And people, if at that time remain self-preservation, casts their shoulders parasitic social classes and their political parties. says the well-known actor and director, artistic director of Theatre "actors Commonwealth Taganka Nikolai Gubenko," people over time, maturation, and rallied to the solution of their own destiny, will find all its power "(quoted from: Arguments and Facts ... 2007 № 32 C 3 ..). Student: How do you envision the development prospects of Russia? Ababii-Din: "Objectively, Russia for positive social development is now only two ways - the Leninist revolution and Stalinist restoration. All other paths lead to an impasse and further exacerbate the situation in the camp - being pushed to the state, civilization and nothingness demographic time great Russia. rebirth of Russia begins with the rebirth of socialism with a human face, with the creation of human civilization in Russia of a new type of socialism. is the only real way to the rebirth of Russia. All other means are not only unpleasant, but the disappearance of the wreckage of the Soviet and Russian civilization. Student: And you believe that Vladimir Putin ("new Russian tsar, as the" Time ") can cause a type of revolution Leninist or Stalinist restoration? Ababii-Din: At least in theory, it can be excluded. Putin could become the same "true" disciple of Lenin, which was Stalin, who has over 20 years to restore the Russian tradition of political relations. Putin, like Stalin, not a revolutionary and a reformer. It is to restore traditional relations of Russian socio-economic development. Yeltsin made a coup against-revolutionary: to destroy the Soviet state, he would not even begun the restoration of traditional Russian social and economic relations, leaving Putin amerikanopodobny unbridled capitalism without the American worker . Instead, he came merchants, lenders, the oligarchs, corrupt officials, corruption and make informokraty "elite" new ruling class, skin robbed the Russian people. For eight years, Putin has taken the first steps towards restoring the Russian state Russian and traditional socio-economic relations, which are essentially socialist. And in these circumstances to make the wrong hands the rudder of the ship of the Russian state - worse than the crime. is a strategic mistake that will lead to the collapse of the Russian state, but also the death of the peoples of Russia and of Russian culture. It is no coincidence, seeing that the enemies of error, internal and external Russia are cheering and pushing the president to ensure that he insisted on his error. But it can and fix it. Take the helm of the ship of state to the new Lzhedmitrija or Simeon, Putin could make restoration or revolutionary revolution from above. If leaders of the ruling class is not smart enough to follow this issue Terrible Ivan Castro, Stalin, Mao Zedong, Deng Xiaoping, Raul, the revolution will start from the bottom, with consequences far more serious State and Russian peoples of the Russian ruling class. Student: But why do you think that such a revolution from above or restoration will not be able to commit, Dmitri Medvedev, as president? Ababii-Din: revolution from above can make a natural born sovereign, such as Amenhotep IV of Egypt, who took the name Akhenaten after the coup, Ivan IV of Russia, called after the coup, the Terrible, Peter the Great, called the father of the fatherland, or the person which the dominant power in the nation and their environment, like Stalin in the USSR. In the 1930's. formally equal to Stalin after the order has been Kaganovich, Kirov, Zhdanov and other secretaries of the Central Committee of the CPSU (b), but none of them could not have done what I did that Georgians Russified . And history acquired him, even if scientists prove Finally, he sacrificed his friend, the Kirov and many others. And now, here's how! Raised a national leader - and the landfill. Eight years of friends and enemies have worked on the authority of Vladimir Putin, has written many books on him, and now he would just throw this waste capital is not used for the construction of a sovereign Russia as an independent power center. Descendants of us do not understand and was convicted of political profligacy. Put on store shelves, libraries, over two hundred pounds, which raises the authority of Vladimir Putin, was appointed a national leader, a man, and even the Tsar of Russia was confused, made a prey "Time" and west of the capital loan shark, which does not focus on the mind of our President and his pro-Western sense, brought the facts of Western culture with which he faced while working in Germany of espionage . But all is not lost! The people have the right not to convince, and to require the application of his leadership of faithful service to the interests of the country in which it was high level of national leadership. Student: It turns out that the departure of Vladimir Putin of the Russian loses big-time political weapon, it was equipped to face their opponents? Ababii-Din: Yes. But it may be even worse if he had these weapons are used against those who armed, as well as by the KGB, which helped to destroy the state and productive forces of the USSR in 1991 Russia today has come back a revolutionary situation, and it is either will result in the Second Russian National Liberation and socialist revolution, or at the end of the collapse of Russia, compared with which the destruction of the Soviet Union seems a school prank. Student: What are the external factors contributing to the maturation of a revolutionary situation in Russia, which aggravates the situation inside the country? Ababii-Din: The global crisis of capitalism and usury of the U.S. dollar collapse predatory social system. "This crisis is not only economic but also the nature of civilization in general ... The total debt issues in the U.S. economy, rising to 50 trillion dollars today, which is about four and a half years of official annual U.S. GDP ... it is more and more, with a rate of 10% per year. This sometimes exceeds the growth rate and U.S. and global economy. is the main indicator of the severity of the crisis ... The global crisis could happen in two weeks. May occur within six months. May occur within two years. But over the next five years, it almost always happens with a probability of 99% (Khazin M. The global crisis and Russia / / Tomorrow. 2008. № 1. S. 1, 2) .. Students: What do you see the main danger of this crisis for Russia? Ababii-Din: The main danger in the absence of real sovereignty of the Russian economic, political and information in its dependence on Western capital usurer in all - from bread to ballpoint pens. "The main problem in Russia today is that its economy is not self-sufficient. Unlike, say, the Soviet economy. The Soviet economy, even if it is completely block imports into the country could offer its citizens a minimum level of food clothing, housing and so on. Today, we are unable to afford food, even "(Ibid. S. 2.). But more important even in it, and that the ruling class in Russia today ' Today is not interested, to create self-supporting economy. But "if Russia will not be an independent center of power, it will inevitably disintegrate. United States can not by a small comprador, hated by the population of the leaders in Moscow to retain much of the area. Therefore, all east of the Urals, fall the hands of China. Semi- be directly included in its territory, it will be partially used. And if so, China is clearly emerging as first among equals in the world of geopolitics, not everyone agreed. In most of China "(ibid.) .. Students: What do you see the reason that the "ruling class of today's Russia is not interested, to create self-supporting economy? Ababii-din: And it ' is a question of questions. Part of the answer given in the article quoted Michael Khazin, in which he writes: "Russia is today - a huge area with vast resources, which is completely absent from the national elite. In general, as a sort of - no. In the division of the world ... Russia as independent centers of power today, not ... if we start to do in Russia, "power center", we need an independent Russian elite, the current system of governance does not exist. Anyone who tried to defend the national interests of the country since the early 90's with an iron hand by the government scrapped. Everything. And under Putin, too "(ibid.) .. Students: Do you think this statement Mr. Khazinah true? Ababii-din: I think it is compatible. Cruelly dumped and continue to throw all person trying to "defend the national interests of the country, from three complementary main power structures - political, economic, informational. And this happened not only under Yeltsin and Putin, but from Khrushchev. Do not go into a long-standing Soviet times, have a look at the past two decades. When President Congress of Russian Communities, a patriot of Russia V. Skokov? When the Attorney General of consciousness A. Kazannik? How clever SY Glazyev, who as minister would be proud of every civilized nation? When the former Minister of Culture of Russia ev patriot S. Mix? If a naive patriot General Lebed IA? When fierce patriot, General Alexander M. Makashov? When playwright VS pink? When the former chairman of the committee print, BS Mironov zetetic? Where writer-patriot MF Antonov? When well-known economist who specializes in traditional Russian economy and prolific Russian writer-writer AO Platonov? When the Attorney General Skuratov Yu, who in the modern civilized could play the role of the famous Skuratov Malyuta? When SN Semanov patriot, 40 years of struggle for national interests of Russia? When the historian and patriot, IY Froyanov? If a talented writer Yuri Mukhin, for 20 years against usurious economics for development of production, the productive economy in Russia? If excellent organizer, writer, historian and specialist in social strategy Podberyozkin AI? When the singer EV lemon Bolshevik national socialism? When the leader of the party "Rodina" Dmitry Rogozin? Many voiced singer of authoritarianism and democracy AA Prokhanov barely afloat. For how long? How many tens and even hundreds of ardent defender of national interests of Russia? They did not really in the current "elite". Nicholas Zenkovich in "Encyclopedia of Putin" gives nearly 400 personalities and nearly by far the president of Russia. There's even a paper on child-owner of Putin's puppy, but there's hardly anyone over the name. Judging by this encyclopedia, for Putin, it is appropriate words of the famous song: "you have to turn left - turn right." Students: What was the result of a "right" rotation? Ababii-Din: In this issue Mr. Khazin answers in the article cited above. Therefore, the selection of the ruling class of people who are not interested in defending national interests, in fact, there were an elite anti-national. It includes "people who now represent the interests of the West in Russia ... It kleptomany facing west. Their children do not live in Russia, many even do not speak Russian. They will inevitably inevitably weaken our country - which was nice to live in retirement in a "civilized" countries "(ibid.) .. If the authorities continue to remain in the hands of an "elite", the song, it will soon be sung. Students: Speak maturation of a revolutionary situation in Russia, you name Putin as a possible leader of the socialist revolution imminent. But he expects that Mr. Putin, if the revolution did not happen or if it fails to take this opportunity? Ababii-Din: One of two things. Either by leading a socialist revolution from above, it will restore the country socialist revolutionary and life will become popular leader in Russia, the first person and in fact and in form. Either permanently cede their positions to the west and rossiyanskim lenders and leave politics and history, ended her life abroad somewhere simple living and shivering in their millions. Money raised by the unfair labor, deprived of moral and spiritual values, but nobody brought neither happiness nor peace. Putin can live a long life, like Kerensky. It is no coincidence that it is two hours per day for the sport. But for history and for myself, as Kerensky, it is always a loser. Third, apparently, is not given. course, besides the desire to fight for his vocation to be the leader of the people and the savior of Russia needed the will and mental capacity, consistent with the objectives level. This about this writing the President of the Presidium, scientific director of the Institute of Globalization Problems, a famous Russian economist and politician MG Delyagin, considering the question of unification of Russia with the Kazakhstan and Belarus: "It seems that Nazarbaev Lukashenka and his strong will and intellectual qualities than Putin, which makes it very probable loss in the competition vnutriapparatnoy natural in a single state. If we recall that Lukashenko and Nazarbayev quite convincingly demonstrate a deep interest in their country and their ability to achieve real, not false, there is a risk that in the case of a significant association of the population of Russia would prefer to find a Head of State is not "clean" Did and "alien" or Nazarbaev Lukashenka (MG Delyagin Retribution on your door The revolution in Russia. when, how, why, Mr., 2007 S. 257? ..). Student: Perhaps this fact is the reason for the departure of Vladimir Putin's policy? Ababii-Din: In terms of capacity mental, Stalin was less than their rivals, but to defeat them. And even that turned into a lack of dignity. And it's not so much the spirit of the leaders of Belarus and Kazakhstan has allowed these states to be higher than Russia in terms of socio-political patriotism and an almost Stalinist in touch with their people. For this reason, "in the modernization of the elite, not to mention the socio-economic, Kazakhstan has surpassed Russia so degraded that it poses to the point of direct reference and immediate "(ibid.. S. 356.). Add to this the fact that Kazakhstan has retained many socialist institutions in management, science, education, medicine, and a steady increase in population, Putin does not have much to learn from Nazarbayev. Students: Does Putin get rid of Yeltsin's legacy? Ababii-Din: "Judging by his speech to the Council of State February 8, 2008, shall, if he wishes strongly. Contrary to the interview on December 12 magazine" Time ", where he sang praises Yeltsin, February 8, he began to criticize Yeltsin's policy of 90-s:. "Russia itself had become a patchwork of territories. Most regions had laws that contradicted the Russian Constitution. Some examples were simply outrageous ... the status of individual territories defined as" a sovereign state associated with the Russian Federation. " Legal provisions have been established under land claims regions held against each other territories ... such dispute, in fact, we have over two thousand. " Maybe the ice was broken and began movement to the maxim of Julius Caesar. "Better to be first in the village and the second in Rome" There remains only the question of what Putin will choose - for better or for worse? February 14, 2008
0 comments:
Post a Comment