Regeringen fejrer Pjotr Stolypin, som uovertruffen reformator, som vi skal tage et eksempel, og selv forberede begivenheder i hundredåret the Stolypin reforms. As stated by First Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev, many of the ideas of the reformers are still relevant and used by the current government - for example the national project in agriculture. The same Dmitry Medvedev, Russia is currently facing challenges in many respects similar to those facing the government a hundred years ago. "Stolypin was able to propose and implement a comprehensive program for modernization of our country. First and foremost, is known for its agrarian reform, but it was not all. It was about the restructuring of industry, the rearmament of the army, strengthening the Russian state as a whole " According to the prime minister," it is important that showed Stolypin reforms, this is how the enormous creative potential, people in Russia because the course when their conduct was done primarily for those who want to work for those with initiative and enterprise . But not only Dmitry Medvedev is admired Peter Stolypin and his reforms. They admire and Agriculture Minister Alexei Gordeev, who told us that our country only in 2002 was to repeat the record levels of grain exports, which was registered in 1912 because of land reform Stolypin. "Historical parallels between the reforms of Stolypin and national projects are obvious, "- says Gordeev. What is the true reason for such a radical turning power, from condemnation to worship Peter Stolypin and his reforms? But let's not get ahead of ourselves, and must understand in order, starting from the time of Stolypin. Stolypin had headed the government from 1906 to 1911 his career a little, unlike the career of another official tsarist government. University, served in the Ministry of State Property (and in modern Russia, many officials began their career by serving in the State Property), a district leader of the nobility, the governor of Saratov province, where he distinguished themselves against the repression of desperate farmers, arranging whippings, demonstrations and perform arrests, Interior Minister, Chairman of the Council of Ministers.
legacy of his father he inherited an estate Kolnoberzhe, near Kaunas, as Arkady Dmitrievich Stolypin won the short and for many years remained the main residence of the family of Peter Stolypin. As Interior Minister Stolypin went a step further and initiated a decree on military tribunals that decide cases "insurgents", rebellious peasants, the sentences that were performed within 24 hours. Executions of peasants continued even after the Duma rejected II decree on military courts because the military continues to operate the city courts.
Introduction Stolypin courts-martial have outraged not only Socialists, but the entire liberal part of society. Member of the Kadet party Fedor Rodichev, termination of Stolypin, called a rope around their necks hung "Stolypin necktie." But it did not bother Stolypin. "First, calm down - and then reform" - a strategy that performed Stolypin. The only sure way to reassure the peasants Stolypin as widespread use of repression in the military field courts in demonstration killings. This reformer preaching Malthusian theory to the Russian way: first, hang, and so for those who remain, improve life. Researchers calculations, only eight months (from August 1906 to April 1907) inform the court martial in 1100 carried the death penalty. Author Vladimir Korolenko noted that in the period of the Stolypin "executions were commonplace."
Board of Stolypin, who heads the government, had a period after the revolutionary reforms. himself was a product of the reform of the Russian bourgeois revolution of 1905, and not a result of "brilliant" insights Stolypin when the Tsarist monarchy and landlords throughout government, it became clear that without land reform, without removal of feudal obligations and peasant bondage without a reform of the state, authority does not hold.
development of capitalism in agrarian relations are constrained by the old feudal relations, medieval granting land tenure and community relations. Social class communities, the attachment of peasants to the soil, the presence of large estates, together with a minimal depictions of peasants, did not contribute to increasing commodity production did not meet the requirements of capitalist methods of agriculture. impoverishment and obezzemelivaniya peasants, as a result of reckless exploitation of landlords and officials, caused a storm of protest, encourage more and more peasant revolts that the requirements of landed estates. For fear of arbitrary seizure estates by peasants, the government and decided to keep the Stolypin agrarian reform, displace some of the peasants in remote areas of Russia, a part - to Redemption lands, and thus bring down the revolutionary wave. But Stolypin, combined with the Romanovs and other large landowners, sought to agrarian reform is not of benefit to millions of peasants, and in the interests of 30,000 landowners who own 70 million hectares of land. peasants fought against landlordism, and those scheduled Stolypin, was driven into the remote and uninhabited margins and financial bondage. Landowners received from the State large sums of redemption, it probably is, according to Medvedev those who wanted to work had initiative and enterprise, and farmers - the sand, long uninhabited frontier regions of Russia and huge debts. Here is the result of the Stolypin agrarian reform-vaunted reforms. Agriculture issue, acute problems during the Revolution of 1905, thanks to the Stolypin reforms resolved in favor of large estates, and not to the peasants that led to the unprecedented famine in 1911, 30 million poor and the oppressed peasants. Landowners exported corn, and farmers eat carrion and dung ash bread that has been demonstrated at a meeting of the Russian Duma. Besides land reform Stolypin, featured in June the third coup, apparently, Dmitry Medvedev, and calls for strengthening the Russian state as a whole. 3 June 1907 issued a manifesto to dissolve the Duma and the change in election rules prepared by the government of Stolypin, which reduces the representation of workers and peasants. Did not like him deputy from the peasants and workers who sought to protect the interests of their constituents. Even authors called this Electoral reform of the electoral law "shameless." But the king, having heard the report of the Stolypin reform the electoral law, adopted it and smiled and said: "I am also a shameless". As a result of this coup III Duma has become more reactionary and more pliable in the hands of Romanov and Stolypin, who made it possible to implement agrarian reform in the interests of landlords, had every right to plunder the peasants. Returning to the days of the day, you can really take note of similarities of the reforms with the reforms of Stolypin. First, the same shameless cut-voting people, and for Second, privatization of state property for the sake of the party and economic nomenklatura, modern landowners. If we compare the reform Stolypin and modern transformations of the last fifteen years of content Stolypin reforms seem to be preferable. Stolypin bread feudal restrictions, clearing the way for the capitalist economic governance, and this was their progressiveness. But our reformers, reactionaries hero as moving from developed monopoly capital (monopoly, forced to serve the people - it is socialism) that the wild and unrestrained capitalism, and thus pulled out all the evils of the capitalist economy that is not create something positive.
Vitaly Glukhov
legacy of his father he inherited an estate Kolnoberzhe, near Kaunas, as Arkady Dmitrievich Stolypin won the short and for many years remained the main residence of the family of Peter Stolypin. As Interior Minister Stolypin went a step further and initiated a decree on military tribunals that decide cases "insurgents", rebellious peasants, the sentences that were performed within 24 hours. Executions of peasants continued even after the Duma rejected II decree on military courts because the military continues to operate the city courts.
Introduction Stolypin courts-martial have outraged not only Socialists, but the entire liberal part of society. Member of the Kadet party Fedor Rodichev, termination of Stolypin, called a rope around their necks hung "Stolypin necktie." But it did not bother Stolypin. "First, calm down - and then reform" - a strategy that performed Stolypin. The only sure way to reassure the peasants Stolypin as widespread use of repression in the military field courts in demonstration killings. This reformer preaching Malthusian theory to the Russian way: first, hang, and so for those who remain, improve life. Researchers calculations, only eight months (from August 1906 to April 1907) inform the court martial in 1100 carried the death penalty. Author Vladimir Korolenko noted that in the period of the Stolypin "executions were commonplace."
Board of Stolypin, who heads the government, had a period after the revolutionary reforms. himself was a product of the reform of the Russian bourgeois revolution of 1905, and not a result of "brilliant" insights Stolypin when the Tsarist monarchy and landlords throughout government, it became clear that without land reform, without removal of feudal obligations and peasant bondage without a reform of the state, authority does not hold.
development of capitalism in agrarian relations are constrained by the old feudal relations, medieval granting land tenure and community relations. Social class communities, the attachment of peasants to the soil, the presence of large estates, together with a minimal depictions of peasants, did not contribute to increasing commodity production did not meet the requirements of capitalist methods of agriculture. impoverishment and obezzemelivaniya peasants, as a result of reckless exploitation of landlords and officials, caused a storm of protest, encourage more and more peasant revolts that the requirements of landed estates. For fear of arbitrary seizure estates by peasants, the government and decided to keep the Stolypin agrarian reform, displace some of the peasants in remote areas of Russia, a part - to Redemption lands, and thus bring down the revolutionary wave. But Stolypin, combined with the Romanovs and other large landowners, sought to agrarian reform is not of benefit to millions of peasants, and in the interests of 30,000 landowners who own 70 million hectares of land. peasants fought against landlordism, and those scheduled Stolypin, was driven into the remote and uninhabited margins and financial bondage. Landowners received from the State large sums of redemption, it probably is, according to Medvedev those who wanted to work had initiative and enterprise, and farmers - the sand, long uninhabited frontier regions of Russia and huge debts. Here is the result of the Stolypin agrarian reform-vaunted reforms. Agriculture issue, acute problems during the Revolution of 1905, thanks to the Stolypin reforms resolved in favor of large estates, and not to the peasants that led to the unprecedented famine in 1911, 30 million poor and the oppressed peasants. Landowners exported corn, and farmers eat carrion and dung ash bread that has been demonstrated at a meeting of the Russian Duma. Besides land reform Stolypin, featured in June the third coup, apparently, Dmitry Medvedev, and calls for strengthening the Russian state as a whole. 3 June 1907 issued a manifesto to dissolve the Duma and the change in election rules prepared by the government of Stolypin, which reduces the representation of workers and peasants. Did not like him deputy from the peasants and workers who sought to protect the interests of their constituents. Even authors called this Electoral reform of the electoral law "shameless." But the king, having heard the report of the Stolypin reform the electoral law, adopted it and smiled and said: "I am also a shameless". As a result of this coup III Duma has become more reactionary and more pliable in the hands of Romanov and Stolypin, who made it possible to implement agrarian reform in the interests of landlords, had every right to plunder the peasants. Returning to the days of the day, you can really take note of similarities of the reforms with the reforms of Stolypin. First, the same shameless cut-voting people, and for Second, privatization of state property for the sake of the party and economic nomenklatura, modern landowners. If we compare the reform Stolypin and modern transformations of the last fifteen years of content Stolypin reforms seem to be preferable. Stolypin bread feudal restrictions, clearing the way for the capitalist economic governance, and this was their progressiveness. But our reformers, reactionaries hero as moving from developed monopoly capital (monopoly, forced to serve the people - it is socialism) that the wild and unrestrained capitalism, and thus pulled out all the evils of the capitalist economy that is not create something positive.
Vitaly Glukhov
0 comments:
Post a Comment