Freiheit der Rede . Author: BABA-Din Datum: 04.03.2008 11.46.38 Revolution oder Restoration?
Von Herzen ganzem Ganzkörper Alles Bewusstsein - Hören Sie sich die Revolution. A. Block Student: Im Dialog "Die Klasse herrschende was confused, "You said that have not been the consistent Marxists today so great personalities that could lead a socialist revolution in Russia. So where to look for a person? In fact, perhaps the conversion, such as They say, "from Saul to Paul? Ababii-Din: This idea has been expressed repeatedly by our political scientists. A talented young economist MG Delyagin, being, in his words, "consistent and seems to be an implacable enemy of Putin, neither is a way of destroying the unlikely event Putinism Putin himself He writes:" In Given the personal capacity, Putin, including the severity of his personal beliefs (which he changed, judging from his biography, at least three times - in the transition to democracy from the KGB Sobchak, then in the service of a commercial oligarchy of the Yeltsin era, and to imitate Finally, to owning the destruction of the latter during the transition of his own country, the power of the oligarchy), and the ability, it can be assumed, and is extremely unlikely developments, such as the destruction of Putinism Putin himself It is true that the plot on the scale, Lenin's New Economic Policy is war communism substitution or release of political prisoners loyal ally of Stalin, Khrushchev, and requires an appropriate scale of personality "(Delyagin MG Retribution outside the front door, the revolution in Russia. When, how, why, M., 2007 ?. . p. 337) A friend of Mikhail Delyagin political scientist Maksim Kalashnikov, this question more clearly and sharply, "You can not prevent a revolution - they lead" (Quoted in Ibid .., p. 18). Student: How to date, the socialist revolution in Russia Ababii-Din: The Second Socialist Revolution, and knocks on the windows and doors in modern Russia. It was only mediocre politicians and ordinary city dwellers do not feel. words of Alexander Blok, where, as a motto as relevant today as in 1917 as in 1917, the national liberation movement revolution in Russia is approaching, both right and left. According to Moskovsky Komsomolets, a former member of the Legislative Assembly of St. Petersburg, Sergei Gulyaev and deputy chairman of Yabloko Alex bulk has a new opposition, the project "Russian National Liberation Movement" (The People) (Premiership Putin - A bluff or reality / Moskovsky Komsomolets . 2008th January 22.). The second Russian revolution, it seems, will not only be a socialist, but at the same time of national liberation. In case of natural persons achieve national speech and social justice. state where the main theme is a thief and not a productive manufacturer can not exist long, it is by definition not sustainable. The country, which is controlled from the ocean, long downtime. is with this realization of the people today, the national liberation, not only the social proximity, but also before him. Student: In terms of your statements, is the leader capable of leading a movement of people for social and national justice, the horizon is not visible. the Marxists, is one such person today. Where the same people, the leader who is able to find a modern national liberation movements and socialist revolution in Russia win? Ababii-Din: In the field of political battle. the now in Russia suffered the most devastating political defeat, even though the latter may also be unknown, and his clique. Student: Who is with us today suffered the most devastating political defeat? Ababii-Din: Our President. If you've heard his voice and seen the face of Vladimir Putin during his New Year's wishes in 31 December 2007, you would agree: It's not the winners and losers of the policy, which is really only one way - for retirement - and the lives of private person in the family. This speech was almost all channels of the country, apparently with the purpose to breathe strength chest pyatidesyatipyatiletnego "elder." But it turned out, quite the opposite. He was absent and the Cathedral of Christ the Saviour in the night of 6 7. January 2008, search seems more distant and more by political storms and passions the home is protected. We have already cited the example of Alexander I and Fyodor Kuzmich ... In Russia the authorities withdraw voluntarily from the political career take off, not without internal mental anguish. Alexander I and Nicholas II were sick people sick of the dynasty. But Putin - a healthy person, which is done well and right and left. And give broken unbeaten in Russia for two. Student: Where was defeated politicians gather a new team of political supporters? Ababii-Din: In his past and present. Unfortunately, we do not know enough, either one or others. all eight years he was fine clever intrigue, no worse than Stalin, hiding their real purpose. The newspapers, both here and abroad, often asked the question: Who is Mr. Putin? And while there is no clear answer, although written more than two hundred books and thousands of articles. Who is he? Communist, in his own words, are stored in that party's ticket? Liberal talk, often about freedom? Democrat who care for the supreme power of the people? In Russia today there is a battle between two great ideologies - Patriotism and cosmopolitanism. But we do not know which belongs to the heart of our President, who reads the Bible in an airplane. If we say that a man should be judged not by words but by deeds, they mean an ordinary person. And on the professional intelligence can not properly be judged not only by him but by his deeds. knowing well that this law, journalists, scouts magazine "Time" in an interview on 12 Appeared in December 2007, full version, which have over the Internet, trying to expose the soul of our president. But all in vain. you could to achieve success when Putin went to all Western intelligence school. But Vladimir Putin a student of Russian and Soviet intelligence, and more sophisticated methods of intelligence "time", he skillfully avoided and important to know about him the interview, no more than prior to interview them. Here he writes about the personal qualities Putin talented German journalist and a good scout, a good judge of politics and people, Peter Scholl-Latour: "Do not expect me to moral judgments, or even psychological analysis of Vladimir Putin . I do not like the look in his eyes, as I have in the eyes of George W. Bush saw, then make the appropriate conclusions about the terrible naivete of the American president. for 24 years in the KGB, Putin was able to not only get a black belt in judo, but the science of hiding seized from prying their thoughts and feelings, and if necessary, even a lie detector to listen "(Scholl-Latour P., Putin's Russia. The effect of compression empire pressure from NATO, China and Islam, M., 2007, p. 195 -... 196). was But if so, to outwit journalists 'time' it not worth much effort. Scouts journalists 'time' looked into Putin a politician who wanted to see what they are, and came to the conclusion that in the rat Vladimir Putin to escape from a Russian ship of state, handed the wheel, the designated successor in Davos, to Russia aboard the U.S. moored Battleship together to storm the Chinese battleship. Such developments after the 2nd March is expected. But it is not predetermined. And this uncertainty is largely dependent on Putin's personality and behavior. Student: What is Vladimir Putin may be a surprise for our foreign neighbors? Ababii-Din: It is possible, with the fact agree that journalists 'time' written on the cover of their magazine: ". Vladimir Putin, the new King of Russia" But today you can not say with certainty which he is king, and what faith: it is the king or a cosmopolitan, Alexander I and Nicholas II, the king or the Patriot was, as he was Ivan the Terrible and Joseph Stalin and how he wants to see the people of Russia. The relationship between Putin and Medvedev today are similar to the relations of Ivan the Terrible and kasimskogo King Simeon Bekbulatovich. In 1574 suddenly surrounding Ivan the Terrible Simeon proclaimed "King of All Russia", settled in the Kremlin and began to call themselves princes of Moscow, called derogatory Ivashko. According to historians, this comedy was necessary, Ivan IV to justify his anger against the boyars. A true master of the Russian land in 1575 Ivan the Terrible, moved to the city older women formed a new Oprichny on army, terrible against the undesirables boyars punishment. As a result, there was a change of the ruling elites and enhanced centralized Russian state. Stalin in 1934, without any public position, nor a general secretary, and since only one of the secretaries of the CPSU (b), has become the real masters of the Soviet state in 1937 to 1939. is replaced by a pro-Western, cosmopolitan elite patriotic than the saved Russia from defeat in the Second World War. as did Mao Zedong during the Cultural Revolution, the strengthening of the young socialist state. But the change of the ruling elite in the Leninist revolution - is to know what to talk about them. Student: Do you think it is in Russia the need to change the ruling elite? Ababii-Din: not only overdue, but it and "overripe". This is one the most important political tasks of the Russian Revolution. Marxist communism and capitalism, Yeltsin - the two vectors of the same origin and Western anti-Russian direction, destructive force. The peak of the Marxist Communist Party's political oligarchy consumers by the redistribution and appropriation of wealth produced by the people occupied. The highlight of the Yeltsin wild capitalism is the financial and commercial oligarchy exorbitant rates also occupied the redistribution and appropriation of the results of the work of others. And in both cases, all power in the hands not of focus and has produced a parasitic Class. Russian can sometimes feed and the two generals, but two Abramovich Feed now the Americans want it this way, he is physically unable. Therefore, Russian and found ourselves short in its ranks at one million dollars per year. strategy Yeltsin as a strategy of Marxism, is not very constructive and destructive. The main fault Putin for all 8 years of his reign in the fact that he is only slightly mitigated the devastating poison Yeltsin, but not rid the country of consumption of opium. But sooner or later the truth breaks out. have now discovered scientists, even such a fact how the poison had been poisoned by Stalin. be The poison, the poison of the Russian people for 20 years, or sooner or later discovered. And the man if he has at this time remain self-preservation raises from their shoulders parasitic social classes and their political parties. says the famous actor and director, artistic director of Theatre Commonwealth actors Taganka Nikolai Gubenko, "People over the age of maturity, and collected for the solution of their own destiny is cited his power" (once more: ... .. Arguments and Facts 2007 № 32 C 3) Student: How do They are the prospects for Russia's development? Ababii-Din: Objectively, Russia for a positive social development is now only two options - Leninist revolution and the Stalinist restoration. All other ways lead to an impasse and the situation worsen in the camp - moved to the state, civilization and demographic nothing once great Russia. Russian recovery begins with the revival of socialism with a human face, with the creation of human civilization in Russia of a new socialist type. This is the only real way to the rebirth of Russia. All other ways are not only unpleasant, but the disappearance of the ruins of the Russian and Soviet culture. Student: And you believe that Vladimir Putin (the Russian czar after the "Time"), a revolution lead Leninist or Stalinist type of restoration Ababii-Din: In theory, this can not be excluded Putin. , the same "true" disciple of Lenin, Stalin was, of restoring the situation in 20 years to the traditional Russian political relations had become. Putin, like Stalin, not a revolutionary and reformer. He is on traditional restore Russia's socio-economic relations. Yeltsin made a counter-revolutionary coup: to destroy the Soviet state, he would not even the restoration of traditional Russian social and economic relations started, so that Putin amerikanopodobny wild capitalism without the American worker. Instead, he came merchants, moneylenders, the oligarchs, corrupt officials, corrupt and makes informokraty "elite" new ruling class, robbed on the skin of the Russian people. For eight years, Putin has made the first steps to restore Russian law and Russia's traditional socio-economic Relations, which essentially socialist taken. And to give in these circumstances, the wrong hands, the head of the Russian ship of state - worse than the crime. This is a strategic mistake that will lead to the collapse of the Russian state, but also about the death of the Russian and other peoples of Russia. It is no coincidence to see that errors are internal and external enemies of Russia cheering crowd and the President to ensure that he insisted on his mistake. But it can and fix it. catching the tip of the ship of state in the new Lzhedmitrija or Simeon, Putin could be revolutionary restoration or revolution from above. If the leaders of the ruling class is not smart enough to follow in this matter to Ivan the Terrible, Stalin, Mao Zedong, Deng Xiaoping, Raul Castro, the revolution will start from the bottom, with a much more serious consequences for the Russian State and the Russian people of the ruling class. Student: But why do you think that such a revolution from above or restoration is not in a position to commit, Dmitri Medvedev, as president? Ababii-Din: revolution from above can make a natural born sovereign, as Amenhotep IV of Egypt that the name after the coup took Akhenaten, Ivan IV of Russia, named after the coup, the Terrible, Peter I, the father of his country, or the person called, the dominant authority in the nation has and in its vicinity, as Stalin in the USSR. in the 1930s. formally equal to Stalin after the order Kaganovich, Kirov, Zhdanov and other secretaries of the Central Committee of the CPSU (b) was, but none of them could not do what I have this Russified Georgians did. And history would absolve him, even if scientists finally prove that he his friend, the Kirov and sacrificed many other supporters. And now here! grew up a national leader - and to the landfill. Eight years have work friends and enemies on the authority of Putin, wrote about him a lot of books, and now it would just throw away this wasteful social capital is not used for the construction of a sovereign Russia as an independent power center. descendants of us do not understand and was sentenced by a political profligacy. Put on the shelves of stores, libraries, over two hundred pounds, increasing the authority of Putin was named a national leader, a man, and even the Russian Tsar, confused him, made a prey "Time" and west of usury capital, does not focus on the mind of our president and his pro-Western is mind, the facts of the Western culture with which he faced while working spy in East Germany. But not all is lost! People have the right not to convince, and the application of his faithful service management, need to protect the interests of the country in which it was to the level of national leadership raised. Student: It turns out that with the departure of Vladimir Putin in Russia loses big-time politics of weapons equipped them to had to do with their opponents? Ababii-Din: Yes. But it can be even worse if he these weapons against those they used to be armed, and the role of the KGB, the state and productive forces of the USSR in 1991 helped destroy in today's Russia has come another revolutionary situation, and it's either leads to the second Russian national liberation movements and socialist revolution, or end in complete collapse of the Russian Federation, in comparison with which the destruction of the Soviet Union seems to be a school prank. Student: What external factors contribute to the Ripening of a revolutionary situation in Russia, exacerbate the situation within the country? Ababii-Din: The global crisis of capitalism and usury threshold of the collapse of the U.S. dollar predatory social system. "This crisis is not only economic but also the nature of the general civilization ... The total debt of the subjects of the American economy, which amounts to 50 trillion today, which is about four and a half of the official annual U.S. GDP ... it is growing at a rate of 10% per year. that exceeds at times the growth rates in the U.S. and global economy. The is the most important indicator of the severity of the crisis ... The global meltdown may happen in two weeks. can happen in six months. can happen in two years. But over the next five years, it almost always happens with a probability of 99% (Khazin M. The global crisis and Russia / / morning. 2008th № 1, p. 1, 2) .. Student: What do you see the greatest danger of this crisis on Russia? Ababii-Din: The greatest danger in the lack of real-Russia economic, political and informational sovereignty, in its dependence on Western capital usury in everything - from Bread sticks and pens. "The main problem in Russia today is that their economy is not self-sufficient. Unlike, say, the Soviet economy. The Soviet economy that block even when fully imported into the country to its citizens a minimum level can of food , clothing, housing and so on. Today, we are unable to provide themselves with food, itself "(ibid. p. 2) .. But above all, not into it, and that the ruling class of today's Russia is not interested in creating self-sustaining economy. But "if Russia is not in an independent West Wing, it will inevitably fall apart. U.S. can not be maintained by a weak comprador, hated by the population of the leadership in Moscow, much of the area. As a result, everything east of the Ural Mountains, falling into the hands of China. be included in part directly in their field, it will be partially used. And if so, then China is clearly first among equals in the world of geopolitics, that someone does not fit. In most of China "(ibid.) .. Student: What do you see reason that the" ruling class of today's Russia is not interested to create self-sustaining Economy?. Ababii-din: And this is a question of questions Part of the answer given in the article cited Michael Khazin, in which he wrote: "Russia is now - a huge area with vast resources that are completely missing is the national elite. In general, as a kind - No Within the division of the world ... Russia as independent power centers, not today ... if we start in Russia do not, "West Wing," we need an independent Russian elite that does not exist in today's system of governance. All those who tried to defend the national interests of the country since the early 90's with an iron Hand rejected by the government. all. And under Putin "(ibid.) .. Student: Do you think this statement is true M. Khazina Ababii-din: I think it is consistent cruel dumped and then throw someone tried. "defense of national interests of the country, from all three major complementary structures of power - information, political, economic,. And this happened not only under Yeltsin and Putin, but starting with Khrushchev. is not to go into a long-standing Soviet times, take a look at the past two decades. If the chairman of the Congress of Russian Communities, a patriot of Russia V. Skokov? Where conscientious Attorney General A. Kazannik? How clever SY Glazyev, the Minister would be as proud of every civilized nation? Where the former Minister of Culture, Russian patriot S. Melent 'ev? Where a naive patriot General Lebed AI? Where wild Patriot, General Alexander M. Makashov? Where the playwright VS pink? Where the former chairman of the Committee Print, Zetetic BS Mironov? Where writer-patriot MF Antonov? Where known economist in the traditional Russian economy and Russia's most prolific writer-writer OA Platonov specialized? Where the Attorney General Skuratov Yu, who could play in the modern civilized form, the role of the famous Malyuta Skuratov? Where Patriot SN Semanov, 40 years of fighting for national interests of Russia? Where the historian and patriot, IY Froyanov? Where a talented writer Yuri Mukhin, for 20 years against usurious interest rates for the economic development of the productive forces, productive economy in Russia? Where an excellent organizer, writer, historian and specialist in social strategy AI Podberyozkin? Where the singer National Bolshevik socialism EV lemon? Where the leader of the party "Rodina" Dmitry Rogozin? polyphonic singer of authoritarianism and democracy AA Prokhanov barely above water. For how long? How many tens and hundreds of the same ardent defender of national interests of Russia? you really do not have in the current "elite". Nicholas Zenkovich in "Putin's Encyclopedia" has 400 personalities from far and near, the President of Russia. There is even a paper devoted to child-owner of Putin's dog puppy, but there is almost no one by name. terms of this encyclopedia, for Putin, it is suitable words from the famous song: "We have to turn left - turn right." Student: What was the result of a "right" rotation? Ababii-Din: In this edition, cited M. Khazin answers in the article. As a result, the selection of the ruling class of people who are not interested in defending the national interests, in fact, it was anti-national elite. It includes "people who today represent the interests of the West in Russia ... It kleptomany oriented to the west. your children do not live in Russia, many in Russia do not speak even language. you inevitably weaken, inevitably our country - it was nice to retire in a "civilized" country living "(ibid.) .. If the authorities continue in the hands of an" elite ", the song will soon must be sung student. Talking about the ripening of a revolutionary situation in Russia, you name Putin as a possible leader of the impending socialist revolution But he expects Putin, when the revolution did not happen or if it is not of this possibility. ? take Ababii-Din. One of two things either by leading a socialist Revolution from above, it is the country a socialist revolutionary restoration and life becomes popular leader in Russia, the first person and in fact and in the form of being. either permanently give up their positions west and rossiyanskim lenders and leave the politics and history, ended his life somewhere abroad easier residents, shivering in their millions. money by unjust division of labor, stripped of moral and spiritual values, but no one has neither happiness nor peace. Putin, a long life, like Kerensky. not by coincidence that he spent two hours a day for the sport. But for history and for myself, as Kerensky, he is still a loser. Thirdly, it seems, is not given. course is to fight alongside the desire for his appointment as leader of the people and the savior of Russia, requires the will and mental performance, appropriate to the level objectives. That's what wrote about this President of the Presidium, scientific director of the Institute of Globalization Problems, a famous Russian economist and politician MG Delyagin, after considering the question of the unification of Russia with Kazakhstan and Belarus seem "There, that Nazarbayev and his Lukashenko's strong will and intellectual qualities Putin, the surplus is very likely, his loss in the natural vnutriapparatnoy makes competition within a single state. If we remember that Lukashenko and Nazarbayev demonstrate quite convincingly a deep concern for their country and the ability to real, not fake the results to achieve, there is a serious risk that would, in the case of a significant association of the Russian population prefer a head of state find any "own" Putin and "alien" or Nazarbayev Lukashenko (Delyagin MG Retribution outside the front door the revolution in Russia. when, how, why, M., 2007 p. 257 ?..). Student: Perhaps this fact is the reason for Putin's departure from the policy? Ababii-Din: In terms of intellectual abilities, Stalin was inferior to their rivals, but they overcome. And even that turned into a lack of dignity. And not so much mind the leaders of Belarus and Kazakhstan, it has to be these countries are higher than Russia in terms of socio-political development as their patriotism and an almost Stalinist in touch with their peoples. For this reason "in the modernization of the elite, not the socio-economic sphere mention, Kazakhstan has been overtaken Russia is building, which for its direct and immediate reference point "(ibid.. p. 356). Add to this the fact that Kazakhstan has kept many socialist institutions in government, science, education, medicine . and is a steady increase in population, Putin has a lot to learn Nazarbayev Student: Will Putin shake off the legacy of the Yeltsin Ababii-Din: "In terms of his speech at the State Council on 8 February 2008, when strong wills. In contrast to an interview on 12 December magazine "Time", where he praised Yeltsin, 8 February, he began the policy Yeltsin criticized 90s. "Russia itself had become a" patchwork "areas. The majority of regions had laws that contradicted the Russian Constitution. Some examples were simply outrageous ... the status of each area defined as" a sovereign state with the Russian Federation are connected. " Legal provisions under the territorial claims regions against each other ... so disputed areas have been kept drawn, in fact, we have over two thousand." Maybe the ice was broken and started a movement, Julius Caesar's maxim: ". Better than first in the village than second in Rome" It remains nur die Frage: Was Putin zu wählen - zum Besseren oder Schlechteren? 14. Februar 2008
Von Herzen ganzem Ganzkörper Alles Bewusstsein - Hören Sie sich die Revolution. A. Block Student: Im Dialog "Die Klasse herrschende was confused, "You said that have not been the consistent Marxists today so great personalities that could lead a socialist revolution in Russia. So where to look for a person? In fact, perhaps the conversion, such as They say, "from Saul to Paul? Ababii-Din: This idea has been expressed repeatedly by our political scientists. A talented young economist MG Delyagin, being, in his words, "consistent and seems to be an implacable enemy of Putin, neither is a way of destroying the unlikely event Putinism Putin himself He writes:" In Given the personal capacity, Putin, including the severity of his personal beliefs (which he changed, judging from his biography, at least three times - in the transition to democracy from the KGB Sobchak, then in the service of a commercial oligarchy of the Yeltsin era, and to imitate Finally, to owning the destruction of the latter during the transition of his own country, the power of the oligarchy), and the ability, it can be assumed, and is extremely unlikely developments, such as the destruction of Putinism Putin himself It is true that the plot on the scale, Lenin's New Economic Policy is war communism substitution or release of political prisoners loyal ally of Stalin, Khrushchev, and requires an appropriate scale of personality "(Delyagin MG Retribution outside the front door, the revolution in Russia. When, how, why, M., 2007 ?. . p. 337) A friend of Mikhail Delyagin political scientist Maksim Kalashnikov, this question more clearly and sharply, "You can not prevent a revolution - they lead" (Quoted in Ibid .., p. 18). Student: How to date, the socialist revolution in Russia Ababii-Din: The Second Socialist Revolution, and knocks on the windows and doors in modern Russia. It was only mediocre politicians and ordinary city dwellers do not feel. words of Alexander Blok, where, as a motto as relevant today as in 1917 as in 1917, the national liberation movement revolution in Russia is approaching, both right and left. According to Moskovsky Komsomolets, a former member of the Legislative Assembly of St. Petersburg, Sergei Gulyaev and deputy chairman of Yabloko Alex bulk has a new opposition, the project "Russian National Liberation Movement" (The People) (Premiership Putin - A bluff or reality / Moskovsky Komsomolets . 2008th January 22.). The second Russian revolution, it seems, will not only be a socialist, but at the same time of national liberation. In case of natural persons achieve national speech and social justice. state where the main theme is a thief and not a productive manufacturer can not exist long, it is by definition not sustainable. The country, which is controlled from the ocean, long downtime. is with this realization of the people today, the national liberation, not only the social proximity, but also before him. Student: In terms of your statements, is the leader capable of leading a movement of people for social and national justice, the horizon is not visible. the Marxists, is one such person today. Where the same people, the leader who is able to find a modern national liberation movements and socialist revolution in Russia win? Ababii-Din: In the field of political battle. the now in Russia suffered the most devastating political defeat, even though the latter may also be unknown, and his clique. Student: Who is with us today suffered the most devastating political defeat? Ababii-Din: Our President. If you've heard his voice and seen the face of Vladimir Putin during his New Year's wishes in 31 December 2007, you would agree: It's not the winners and losers of the policy, which is really only one way - for retirement - and the lives of private person in the family. This speech was almost all channels of the country, apparently with the purpose to breathe strength chest pyatidesyatipyatiletnego "elder." But it turned out, quite the opposite. He was absent and the Cathedral of Christ the Saviour in the night of 6 7. January 2008, search seems more distant and more by political storms and passions the home is protected. We have already cited the example of Alexander I and Fyodor Kuzmich ... In Russia the authorities withdraw voluntarily from the political career take off, not without internal mental anguish. Alexander I and Nicholas II were sick people sick of the dynasty. But Putin - a healthy person, which is done well and right and left. And give broken unbeaten in Russia for two. Student: Where was defeated politicians gather a new team of political supporters? Ababii-Din: In his past and present. Unfortunately, we do not know enough, either one or others. all eight years he was fine clever intrigue, no worse than Stalin, hiding their real purpose. The newspapers, both here and abroad, often asked the question: Who is Mr. Putin? And while there is no clear answer, although written more than two hundred books and thousands of articles. Who is he? Communist, in his own words, are stored in that party's ticket? Liberal talk, often about freedom? Democrat who care for the supreme power of the people? In Russia today there is a battle between two great ideologies - Patriotism and cosmopolitanism. But we do not know which belongs to the heart of our President, who reads the Bible in an airplane. If we say that a man should be judged not by words but by deeds, they mean an ordinary person. And on the professional intelligence can not properly be judged not only by him but by his deeds. knowing well that this law, journalists, scouts magazine "Time" in an interview on 12 Appeared in December 2007, full version, which have over the Internet, trying to expose the soul of our president. But all in vain. you could to achieve success when Putin went to all Western intelligence school. But Vladimir Putin a student of Russian and Soviet intelligence, and more sophisticated methods of intelligence "time", he skillfully avoided and important to know about him the interview, no more than prior to interview them. Here he writes about the personal qualities Putin talented German journalist and a good scout, a good judge of politics and people, Peter Scholl-Latour: "Do not expect me to moral judgments, or even psychological analysis of Vladimir Putin . I do not like the look in his eyes, as I have in the eyes of George W. Bush saw, then make the appropriate conclusions about the terrible naivete of the American president. for 24 years in the KGB, Putin was able to not only get a black belt in judo, but the science of hiding seized from prying their thoughts and feelings, and if necessary, even a lie detector to listen "(Scholl-Latour P., Putin's Russia. The effect of compression empire pressure from NATO, China and Islam, M., 2007, p. 195 -... 196). was But if so, to outwit journalists 'time' it not worth much effort. Scouts journalists 'time' looked into Putin a politician who wanted to see what they are, and came to the conclusion that in the rat Vladimir Putin to escape from a Russian ship of state, handed the wheel, the designated successor in Davos, to Russia aboard the U.S. moored Battleship together to storm the Chinese battleship. Such developments after the 2nd March is expected. But it is not predetermined. And this uncertainty is largely dependent on Putin's personality and behavior. Student: What is Vladimir Putin may be a surprise for our foreign neighbors? Ababii-Din: It is possible, with the fact agree that journalists 'time' written on the cover of their magazine: ". Vladimir Putin, the new King of Russia" But today you can not say with certainty which he is king, and what faith: it is the king or a cosmopolitan, Alexander I and Nicholas II, the king or the Patriot was, as he was Ivan the Terrible and Joseph Stalin and how he wants to see the people of Russia. The relationship between Putin and Medvedev today are similar to the relations of Ivan the Terrible and kasimskogo King Simeon Bekbulatovich. In 1574 suddenly surrounding Ivan the Terrible Simeon proclaimed "King of All Russia", settled in the Kremlin and began to call themselves princes of Moscow, called derogatory Ivashko. According to historians, this comedy was necessary, Ivan IV to justify his anger against the boyars. A true master of the Russian land in 1575 Ivan the Terrible, moved to the city older women formed a new Oprichny on army, terrible against the undesirables boyars punishment. As a result, there was a change of the ruling elites and enhanced centralized Russian state. Stalin in 1934, without any public position, nor a general secretary, and since only one of the secretaries of the CPSU (b), has become the real masters of the Soviet state in 1937 to 1939. is replaced by a pro-Western, cosmopolitan elite patriotic than the saved Russia from defeat in the Second World War. as did Mao Zedong during the Cultural Revolution, the strengthening of the young socialist state. But the change of the ruling elite in the Leninist revolution - is to know what to talk about them. Student: Do you think it is in Russia the need to change the ruling elite? Ababii-Din: not only overdue, but it and "overripe". This is one the most important political tasks of the Russian Revolution. Marxist communism and capitalism, Yeltsin - the two vectors of the same origin and Western anti-Russian direction, destructive force. The peak of the Marxist Communist Party's political oligarchy consumers by the redistribution and appropriation of wealth produced by the people occupied. The highlight of the Yeltsin wild capitalism is the financial and commercial oligarchy exorbitant rates also occupied the redistribution and appropriation of the results of the work of others. And in both cases, all power in the hands not of focus and has produced a parasitic Class. Russian can sometimes feed and the two generals, but two Abramovich Feed now the Americans want it this way, he is physically unable. Therefore, Russian and found ourselves short in its ranks at one million dollars per year. strategy Yeltsin as a strategy of Marxism, is not very constructive and destructive. The main fault Putin for all 8 years of his reign in the fact that he is only slightly mitigated the devastating poison Yeltsin, but not rid the country of consumption of opium. But sooner or later the truth breaks out. have now discovered scientists, even such a fact how the poison had been poisoned by Stalin. be The poison, the poison of the Russian people for 20 years, or sooner or later discovered. And the man if he has at this time remain self-preservation raises from their shoulders parasitic social classes and their political parties. says the famous actor and director, artistic director of Theatre Commonwealth actors Taganka Nikolai Gubenko, "People over the age of maturity, and collected for the solution of their own destiny is cited his power" (once more: ... .. Arguments and Facts 2007 № 32 C 3) Student: How do They are the prospects for Russia's development? Ababii-Din: Objectively, Russia for a positive social development is now only two options - Leninist revolution and the Stalinist restoration. All other ways lead to an impasse and the situation worsen in the camp - moved to the state, civilization and demographic nothing once great Russia. Russian recovery begins with the revival of socialism with a human face, with the creation of human civilization in Russia of a new socialist type. This is the only real way to the rebirth of Russia. All other ways are not only unpleasant, but the disappearance of the ruins of the Russian and Soviet culture. Student: And you believe that Vladimir Putin (the Russian czar after the "Time"), a revolution lead Leninist or Stalinist type of restoration Ababii-Din: In theory, this can not be excluded Putin. , the same "true" disciple of Lenin, Stalin was, of restoring the situation in 20 years to the traditional Russian political relations had become. Putin, like Stalin, not a revolutionary and reformer. He is on traditional restore Russia's socio-economic relations. Yeltsin made a counter-revolutionary coup: to destroy the Soviet state, he would not even the restoration of traditional Russian social and economic relations started, so that Putin amerikanopodobny wild capitalism without the American worker. Instead, he came merchants, moneylenders, the oligarchs, corrupt officials, corrupt and makes informokraty "elite" new ruling class, robbed on the skin of the Russian people. For eight years, Putin has made the first steps to restore Russian law and Russia's traditional socio-economic Relations, which essentially socialist taken. And to give in these circumstances, the wrong hands, the head of the Russian ship of state - worse than the crime. This is a strategic mistake that will lead to the collapse of the Russian state, but also about the death of the Russian and other peoples of Russia. It is no coincidence to see that errors are internal and external enemies of Russia cheering crowd and the President to ensure that he insisted on his mistake. But it can and fix it. catching the tip of the ship of state in the new Lzhedmitrija or Simeon, Putin could be revolutionary restoration or revolution from above. If the leaders of the ruling class is not smart enough to follow in this matter to Ivan the Terrible, Stalin, Mao Zedong, Deng Xiaoping, Raul Castro, the revolution will start from the bottom, with a much more serious consequences for the Russian State and the Russian people of the ruling class. Student: But why do you think that such a revolution from above or restoration is not in a position to commit, Dmitri Medvedev, as president? Ababii-Din: revolution from above can make a natural born sovereign, as Amenhotep IV of Egypt that the name after the coup took Akhenaten, Ivan IV of Russia, named after the coup, the Terrible, Peter I, the father of his country, or the person called, the dominant authority in the nation has and in its vicinity, as Stalin in the USSR. in the 1930s. formally equal to Stalin after the order Kaganovich, Kirov, Zhdanov and other secretaries of the Central Committee of the CPSU (b) was, but none of them could not do what I have this Russified Georgians did. And history would absolve him, even if scientists finally prove that he his friend, the Kirov and sacrificed many other supporters. And now here! grew up a national leader - and to the landfill. Eight years have work friends and enemies on the authority of Putin, wrote about him a lot of books, and now it would just throw away this wasteful social capital is not used for the construction of a sovereign Russia as an independent power center. descendants of us do not understand and was sentenced by a political profligacy. Put on the shelves of stores, libraries, over two hundred pounds, increasing the authority of Putin was named a national leader, a man, and even the Russian Tsar, confused him, made a prey "Time" and west of usury capital, does not focus on the mind of our president and his pro-Western is mind, the facts of the Western culture with which he faced while working spy in East Germany. But not all is lost! People have the right not to convince, and the application of his faithful service management, need to protect the interests of the country in which it was to the level of national leadership raised. Student: It turns out that with the departure of Vladimir Putin in Russia loses big-time politics of weapons equipped them to had to do with their opponents? Ababii-Din: Yes. But it can be even worse if he these weapons against those they used to be armed, and the role of the KGB, the state and productive forces of the USSR in 1991 helped destroy in today's Russia has come another revolutionary situation, and it's either leads to the second Russian national liberation movements and socialist revolution, or end in complete collapse of the Russian Federation, in comparison with which the destruction of the Soviet Union seems to be a school prank. Student: What external factors contribute to the Ripening of a revolutionary situation in Russia, exacerbate the situation within the country? Ababii-Din: The global crisis of capitalism and usury threshold of the collapse of the U.S. dollar predatory social system. "This crisis is not only economic but also the nature of the general civilization ... The total debt of the subjects of the American economy, which amounts to 50 trillion today, which is about four and a half of the official annual U.S. GDP ... it is growing at a rate of 10% per year. that exceeds at times the growth rates in the U.S. and global economy. The is the most important indicator of the severity of the crisis ... The global meltdown may happen in two weeks. can happen in six months. can happen in two years. But over the next five years, it almost always happens with a probability of 99% (Khazin M. The global crisis and Russia / / morning. 2008th № 1, p. 1, 2) .. Student: What do you see the greatest danger of this crisis on Russia? Ababii-Din: The greatest danger in the lack of real-Russia economic, political and informational sovereignty, in its dependence on Western capital usury in everything - from Bread sticks and pens. "The main problem in Russia today is that their economy is not self-sufficient. Unlike, say, the Soviet economy. The Soviet economy that block even when fully imported into the country to its citizens a minimum level can of food , clothing, housing and so on. Today, we are unable to provide themselves with food, itself "(ibid. p. 2) .. But above all, not into it, and that the ruling class of today's Russia is not interested in creating self-sustaining economy. But "if Russia is not in an independent West Wing, it will inevitably fall apart. U.S. can not be maintained by a weak comprador, hated by the population of the leadership in Moscow, much of the area. As a result, everything east of the Ural Mountains, falling into the hands of China. be included in part directly in their field, it will be partially used. And if so, then China is clearly first among equals in the world of geopolitics, that someone does not fit. In most of China "(ibid.) .. Student: What do you see reason that the" ruling class of today's Russia is not interested to create self-sustaining Economy?. Ababii-din: And this is a question of questions Part of the answer given in the article cited Michael Khazin, in which he wrote: "Russia is now - a huge area with vast resources that are completely missing is the national elite. In general, as a kind - No Within the division of the world ... Russia as independent power centers, not today ... if we start in Russia do not, "West Wing," we need an independent Russian elite that does not exist in today's system of governance. All those who tried to defend the national interests of the country since the early 90's with an iron Hand rejected by the government. all. And under Putin "(ibid.) .. Student: Do you think this statement is true M. Khazina Ababii-din: I think it is consistent cruel dumped and then throw someone tried. "defense of national interests of the country, from all three major complementary structures of power - information, political, economic,. And this happened not only under Yeltsin and Putin, but starting with Khrushchev. is not to go into a long-standing Soviet times, take a look at the past two decades. If the chairman of the Congress of Russian Communities, a patriot of Russia V. Skokov? Where conscientious Attorney General A. Kazannik? How clever SY Glazyev, the Minister would be as proud of every civilized nation? Where the former Minister of Culture, Russian patriot S. Melent 'ev? Where a naive patriot General Lebed AI? Where wild Patriot, General Alexander M. Makashov? Where the playwright VS pink? Where the former chairman of the Committee Print, Zetetic BS Mironov? Where writer-patriot MF Antonov? Where known economist in the traditional Russian economy and Russia's most prolific writer-writer OA Platonov specialized? Where the Attorney General Skuratov Yu, who could play in the modern civilized form, the role of the famous Malyuta Skuratov? Where Patriot SN Semanov, 40 years of fighting for national interests of Russia? Where the historian and patriot, IY Froyanov? Where a talented writer Yuri Mukhin, for 20 years against usurious interest rates for the economic development of the productive forces, productive economy in Russia? Where an excellent organizer, writer, historian and specialist in social strategy AI Podberyozkin? Where the singer National Bolshevik socialism EV lemon? Where the leader of the party "Rodina" Dmitry Rogozin? polyphonic singer of authoritarianism and democracy AA Prokhanov barely above water. For how long? How many tens and hundreds of the same ardent defender of national interests of Russia? you really do not have in the current "elite". Nicholas Zenkovich in "Putin's Encyclopedia" has 400 personalities from far and near, the President of Russia. There is even a paper devoted to child-owner of Putin's dog puppy, but there is almost no one by name. terms of this encyclopedia, for Putin, it is suitable words from the famous song: "We have to turn left - turn right." Student: What was the result of a "right" rotation? Ababii-Din: In this edition, cited M. Khazin answers in the article. As a result, the selection of the ruling class of people who are not interested in defending the national interests, in fact, it was anti-national elite. It includes "people who today represent the interests of the West in Russia ... It kleptomany oriented to the west. your children do not live in Russia, many in Russia do not speak even language. you inevitably weaken, inevitably our country - it was nice to retire in a "civilized" country living "(ibid.) .. If the authorities continue in the hands of an" elite ", the song will soon must be sung student. Talking about the ripening of a revolutionary situation in Russia, you name Putin as a possible leader of the impending socialist revolution But he expects Putin, when the revolution did not happen or if it is not of this possibility. ? take Ababii-Din. One of two things either by leading a socialist Revolution from above, it is the country a socialist revolutionary restoration and life becomes popular leader in Russia, the first person and in fact and in the form of being. either permanently give up their positions west and rossiyanskim lenders and leave the politics and history, ended his life somewhere abroad easier residents, shivering in their millions. money by unjust division of labor, stripped of moral and spiritual values, but no one has neither happiness nor peace. Putin, a long life, like Kerensky. not by coincidence that he spent two hours a day for the sport. But for history and for myself, as Kerensky, he is still a loser. Thirdly, it seems, is not given. course is to fight alongside the desire for his appointment as leader of the people and the savior of Russia, requires the will and mental performance, appropriate to the level objectives. That's what wrote about this President of the Presidium, scientific director of the Institute of Globalization Problems, a famous Russian economist and politician MG Delyagin, after considering the question of the unification of Russia with Kazakhstan and Belarus seem "There, that Nazarbayev and his Lukashenko's strong will and intellectual qualities Putin, the surplus is very likely, his loss in the natural vnutriapparatnoy makes competition within a single state. If we remember that Lukashenko and Nazarbayev demonstrate quite convincingly a deep concern for their country and the ability to real, not fake the results to achieve, there is a serious risk that would, in the case of a significant association of the Russian population prefer a head of state find any "own" Putin and "alien" or Nazarbayev Lukashenko (Delyagin MG Retribution outside the front door the revolution in Russia. when, how, why, M., 2007 p. 257 ?..). Student: Perhaps this fact is the reason for Putin's departure from the policy? Ababii-Din: In terms of intellectual abilities, Stalin was inferior to their rivals, but they overcome. And even that turned into a lack of dignity. And not so much mind the leaders of Belarus and Kazakhstan, it has to be these countries are higher than Russia in terms of socio-political development as their patriotism and an almost Stalinist in touch with their peoples. For this reason "in the modernization of the elite, not the socio-economic sphere mention, Kazakhstan has been overtaken Russia is building, which for its direct and immediate reference point "(ibid.. p. 356). Add to this the fact that Kazakhstan has kept many socialist institutions in government, science, education, medicine . and is a steady increase in population, Putin has a lot to learn Nazarbayev Student: Will Putin shake off the legacy of the Yeltsin Ababii-Din: "In terms of his speech at the State Council on 8 February 2008, when strong wills. In contrast to an interview on 12 December magazine "Time", where he praised Yeltsin, 8 February, he began the policy Yeltsin criticized 90s. "Russia itself had become a" patchwork "areas. The majority of regions had laws that contradicted the Russian Constitution. Some examples were simply outrageous ... the status of each area defined as" a sovereign state with the Russian Federation are connected. " Legal provisions under the territorial claims regions against each other ... so disputed areas have been kept drawn, in fact, we have over two thousand." Maybe the ice was broken and started a movement, Julius Caesar's maxim: ". Better than first in the village than second in Rome" It remains nur die Frage: Was Putin zu wählen - zum Besseren oder Schlechteren? 14. Februar 2008
0 comments:
Post a Comment