government celebrates Pyotr Stolypin, as none reformers with whom we have to take one example, and also preparing for the events of the centennial of Stolypin reforms. As stated First Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev, left many of the ideas of the reformers are relevant and used by the current government - for example, the national project in agriculture. The same Dmitry Medvedev, Russia currently faces challenges in many respects similar to those faced government a century ago. "Stolypin was able to propose and implement a comprehensive program to modernize our country. First, it is well known for its agricultural reform, but it was not all. It was about the restructuring of the industry, the rearmament of the army, strengthening the Russian state as a whole " According to the Prime Minister," the main thing that Stolypin's reforms, this is how the huge creative potential, the people of Russia, because the rate when its behavior is primarily for those who want to work for people with initiative and entrepreneurial spirit made . Not only Dmitri Medvedev is admired Peter Stolypin and his reforms. She admires and Agriculture Minister Alexei Gordeyev, who has been told that our country only in 2002, again to a record level of grain exports, which began in 1912 under the reform Stolypin land. "Historical parallels between the reforms of Stolypin and national projects are obvious," - says Gordeev. What is the real reason for such a radical shift of power from condemnation of worship Peter Stolypin and his reforms? But let us anticipate not, and will to understand, from the time of Stolypin. Stolypin, the government had from 1906 to 1911 his career a little different than the career of another officer in the Tsarist Government led. University, served in the Ministry of State Security Properties (and in today's Russia, many officials began her career with service in the State Property), a district leader of the nobility, the Office of the Governor in the province of Saratov, where he opposed the suppression of desperate farmers, arranging whippings, demonstrations and implementation arrests, Interior Minister, Chairman of the Council of Ministers.
The legacy of his father he inherited an estate Kolnoberzhe, near Kaunas, Arkady Dmitrievich Stolypin has won at cards, and remained for many years the principal residence the family of Peter Stolypin. As Interior Minister Stolypin went a step further and initiated a decree on martial courts deciding cases "rebels", rebellious peasants, the sentences were carried out within 24 hours. continued executions of peasants were also rejected by the Duma II decree martial courts because the military continues to operate the district courts.
introduction Stolypin courts-martial has outraged not only the Social Democrats, but the entire liberal part of society. member of the Kadet party Fedor Rodichev, denouncing the Stolypin, called a rope around his neck hung "Stolypin necktie." But it bothered Stolypin. "First, rest - and then reform" - carried out a strategy Stolypin. The only sure way to keep the peasants quiet Stolypin the widespread use of repression seen in military courts demonstration killings. This reformer preaching Malthusian the Russian way: First, hang, and then, for those who stay to improve their lives. Researchers' calculations are carried out only eight months (August 1906-April 1907) courts-martial in 1100 the death penalty. writer Vladimir Korolenko noted that during the period of the Stolypin "executions were commonplace."
Board Stolypin as Prime Minister, had a post-revolutionary reforms. were themselves the product of the reform of the Russian bourgeois revolution of 1905, and not the result of "brilliant" insights Stolypin, when the Tsarist monarchy and landlords throughout the government, when it became clear that without land reform, without elimination of feudal obligations and peasant serfdom, without reform of the state, not to keep authority.
development of capitalism in agrarian relations, by the old feudal relations, restricted medieval land allocation and community relations. social class community, the attachment of peasants to the land, the presence of large estates, together with a tiny parcel of the farmers, not to increase the production of goods not meet the requirements of capitalist methods of agriculture. obezzemelivaniya poverty and peasantry, as a result of ruthless exploitation by landlords and officials, caused a storm of protest, encourage more and more peasant revolts to the requirements of large estates. For fear of arbitrary Seizure of land by farmers, the government and decided to keep Stolypin agrarian reforms, displacing some of the farmers in remote areas of the Russian Federation, supply - give Redemption lands, thereby reducing the revolutionary wave. But Stolypin, the Romanovs and other landowners, sought land reform is not coupled in the interests of millions of farmers and in the interests of 30,000 landlords, have 70 million hectares land. The farmers fought against large estates, and they, according to the plan Stolypin, was driven into the remote and uninhabited margins and financial bondage. The landowners received from the state huge sums of redemption, it is likely, according to Medvedev those who wanted to work, which had the initiative and businesses and farmers - the sand, long uninhabited frontier regions of Russia and huge debts. Here is the result of Stolypin agrarian reforms praised. The Agrarian Question, acute problems during the revolution of 1905, will be solved thanks to the Stolypin reforms in favor of large landowners, and not to the farmers, the unprecedented famine in 1911 led, 30 million poor and oppressed peasants. landowners exported corn farmers and eat carrion and dung ash-bread, which will be demonstrated at a meeting of the State Duma. Stolypin land reform side was presented in the June Third coup, apparently, Dmitry Medvedev calls, and to strengthen the Russian state as a whole. third June 1907 issued manifesto to the Duma and the change in electoral rules by the government of Stolypin, who prepared to dissolve the reduced representation of the workers and peasants. did not like him deputy from the peasants and workers who tried to protect the interests of their constituents. the authors of the Electoral Commission called this reform of the electoral law "shameless". But the king, having heard the report of the Stolypin electoral reform, took it and smiled and said: "I'm a shameless". become As a result of this reactionary coup III Duma and docile in the hands of the Romanovs and Stolypin, which allowed for the implementation of agrarian reform in the interests of landlords, got every right to plunder the peasants. return to the days of today, you can really note the similarities of the reforms with the reforms of Stolypin. first vote, the same shameless cuts rights of the people, and second, the privatization of state property in the interest of the party and economic nomenklatura, modern landowners. If we reform Stolypin and contemporary transformations for the last fifteen years to compare the contents seem, the Stolypin reforms prefer. Stolypin broke the feudal restrictions, the path of capitalist economic activity, and that was their progressiveness. But our reformers, reactionaries really, because of the advanced monopoly capitalism (monopoly, forced to serve the people - is that socialism) moved to moved to the wild and unbridled capitalism, and that all the evils of the capitalist economy, not create something positive.
Vitaly Glukhov
The legacy of his father he inherited an estate Kolnoberzhe, near Kaunas, Arkady Dmitrievich Stolypin has won at cards, and remained for many years the principal residence the family of Peter Stolypin. As Interior Minister Stolypin went a step further and initiated a decree on martial courts deciding cases "rebels", rebellious peasants, the sentences were carried out within 24 hours. continued executions of peasants were also rejected by the Duma II decree martial courts because the military continues to operate the district courts.
introduction Stolypin courts-martial has outraged not only the Social Democrats, but the entire liberal part of society. member of the Kadet party Fedor Rodichev, denouncing the Stolypin, called a rope around his neck hung "Stolypin necktie." But it bothered Stolypin. "First, rest - and then reform" - carried out a strategy Stolypin. The only sure way to keep the peasants quiet Stolypin the widespread use of repression seen in military courts demonstration killings. This reformer preaching Malthusian the Russian way: First, hang, and then, for those who stay to improve their lives. Researchers' calculations are carried out only eight months (August 1906-April 1907) courts-martial in 1100 the death penalty. writer Vladimir Korolenko noted that during the period of the Stolypin "executions were commonplace."
Board Stolypin as Prime Minister, had a post-revolutionary reforms. were themselves the product of the reform of the Russian bourgeois revolution of 1905, and not the result of "brilliant" insights Stolypin, when the Tsarist monarchy and landlords throughout the government, when it became clear that without land reform, without elimination of feudal obligations and peasant serfdom, without reform of the state, not to keep authority.
development of capitalism in agrarian relations, by the old feudal relations, restricted medieval land allocation and community relations. social class community, the attachment of peasants to the land, the presence of large estates, together with a tiny parcel of the farmers, not to increase the production of goods not meet the requirements of capitalist methods of agriculture. obezzemelivaniya poverty and peasantry, as a result of ruthless exploitation by landlords and officials, caused a storm of protest, encourage more and more peasant revolts to the requirements of large estates. For fear of arbitrary Seizure of land by farmers, the government and decided to keep Stolypin agrarian reforms, displacing some of the farmers in remote areas of the Russian Federation, supply - give Redemption lands, thereby reducing the revolutionary wave. But Stolypin, the Romanovs and other landowners, sought land reform is not coupled in the interests of millions of farmers and in the interests of 30,000 landlords, have 70 million hectares land. The farmers fought against large estates, and they, according to the plan Stolypin, was driven into the remote and uninhabited margins and financial bondage. The landowners received from the state huge sums of redemption, it is likely, according to Medvedev those who wanted to work, which had the initiative and businesses and farmers - the sand, long uninhabited frontier regions of Russia and huge debts. Here is the result of Stolypin agrarian reforms praised. The Agrarian Question, acute problems during the revolution of 1905, will be solved thanks to the Stolypin reforms in favor of large landowners, and not to the farmers, the unprecedented famine in 1911 led, 30 million poor and oppressed peasants. landowners exported corn farmers and eat carrion and dung ash-bread, which will be demonstrated at a meeting of the State Duma. Stolypin land reform side was presented in the June Third coup, apparently, Dmitry Medvedev calls, and to strengthen the Russian state as a whole. third June 1907 issued manifesto to the Duma and the change in electoral rules by the government of Stolypin, who prepared to dissolve the reduced representation of the workers and peasants. did not like him deputy from the peasants and workers who tried to protect the interests of their constituents. the authors of the Electoral Commission called this reform of the electoral law "shameless". But the king, having heard the report of the Stolypin electoral reform, took it and smiled and said: "I'm a shameless". become As a result of this reactionary coup III Duma and docile in the hands of the Romanovs and Stolypin, which allowed for the implementation of agrarian reform in the interests of landlords, got every right to plunder the peasants. return to the days of today, you can really note the similarities of the reforms with the reforms of Stolypin. first vote, the same shameless cuts rights of the people, and second, the privatization of state property in the interest of the party and economic nomenklatura, modern landowners. If we reform Stolypin and contemporary transformations for the last fifteen years to compare the contents seem, the Stolypin reforms prefer. Stolypin broke the feudal restrictions, the path of capitalist economic activity, and that was their progressiveness. But our reformers, reactionaries really, because of the advanced monopoly capitalism (monopoly, forced to serve the people - is that socialism) moved to moved to the wild and unbridled capitalism, and that all the evils of the capitalist economy, not create something positive.
Vitaly Glukhov
0 comments:
Post a Comment