Government famous Peter Stolypin, unsurpassed as a reformer, with whom we have to take one example, and even prepare for the centenary of the Stolypin reforms. As stated by the First Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev, many reformers' ideas remain relevant and are used by the government - for example, the national project in agriculture. According to the same , Dmitri Medvedev, Russia currently faces challenges in many respects similar to those of the government facing a hundred years. "Stolypin was able to propose and implement a comprehensive program of modernization of our country. First, is known for its agrarian reform, but it was not all. It was about the restructuring of industry, the rearmament of the army, strengthening the Russian state as a whole " According to the Prime Minister," the main thing that showed the Stolypin reforms, that is how the enormous potential creation of a population of Russia, because the rate when their conduct was made primarily for those who want to work for those who have the initiative and enterprise . But Medvedev is not only admired Pyotr Stolypin and his reforms. They admire and Alexei Gordeev Minister of Agriculture, who said that our country only in 2002 was to repeat the record exports of cereals, which were recorded in 1912 due to land reform Stolypin. "Historical parallels between the Stolypin reforms and projects are obvious," - said Gordeev. What is the real reason for such a radical power of turning, sentenced to worship Piotr Stolypin and his reforms? But do not get ahead of ourselves, and understand in order, from the time of Stolypin. Stolypin had headed the government from 1906 to 1911 his career a bit, unlike the career of any officer of the tsarist government. University, served in the Ministry of State Property (and in modern Russia, many officials began their careers with service in state ownership), a district leader of the nobility, the position of Governor of the Province of Saratov, where he distinguished himself against the repression of desperate farmers, organization lashes, demonstrations and implementation arrests, Interior Minister, Chairman of the Council of Ministers.
The legacy of his father, he inherited an estate near Kaunas Kolnoberzhe, Arkady Dmitrievich Stolypin who won at cards, and remained for many years the principal residence of the family of Peter Stolypin . As Interior Minister Stolypin went further and issued a decree on martial courts, which decide cases of rebels, peasants revolted, the sentences were carried out within 24 hours. executions of peasants have continued even after that the Duma has rejected the decree on martial II because the military continued to operate the district courts.
Introduction Stolypin court martial has shocked not only the Social Democrats, but the entire liberal society. member of the Kadet party Rodichev Fedor, denouncing the Stolypin, called rope around his neck hung "Stolypin necktie." But he did not bother Stolypin. "First, the quiet - and then reform" - a strategy implemented Stolypin. The only sure way to calm the peasants Stolypin saw the widespread use of repression in military courts in murders demonstration. This reformer preaching Malthusian theory in Russian: the first lock, then, for those who stay, improve life. researchers' calculations, only eight months (August 1906-April 1907) in court martial in 1100 facing the death penalty. writer Vladimir Korolenko noted that during the period Stolypin's "executions were commonplace.
Council Stolypin, as head of government, had a point after the revolutionary reforms. They themselves were the product of the reform of the Russian bourgeois revolution of 1905, and not the result of "brilliant" insight Stolypin, when the Tsarist monarchy and owners within the government, it became evident that without reform land, without elimination of feudal obligations and servitude of the peasants, without reform of the state, authority does not hold. The
development of capitalism in agrarian relations, forced by the feudal relations, medieval land allocation and community relationships. community class, the peasants' attachment to land, the presence of large landholdings, with a tiny peasant plots did not increase the production of commodities do not meet the requirements of methods capitalist agriculture. Depletion and peasantry obezzemelivaniya, following the ruthless exploitation by landowners and officials, provoked a storm of protest, peasant revolts prompting more and more, the requirements of large estates. Fearing the arbitrary seizure estates by peasants, the government has decided to hold the land reform Stolypin, displacing some of the peasants in remote areas of Russia, part - by providing land acquisition and thus reducing the revolutionary wave. But Stolypin, coupled with the Romanovs and other landowners, sought to land reform is not in the interest of millions of peasants, and in the interests of 30,000 owners, having 70 million acres of land. peasants fought against feudalism, and they, along the plane of Stolypin, was conducted in remote and uninhabited margins and financial bondage. owners have received huge sums of state redemption, it is likely, according to Medvedev, who wanted to work, which took the initiative and enterprise, and farmers - the sand, long uninhabited frontier regions of Russia and huge debts. Here is the result of the Stolypin agrarian reforms praised. The agrarian question, serious problems during the revolution 1905, thanks to the reforms of Stolypin resolved in favor of large landholdings, not to the peasants, which led to an unprecedented famine in 1911, 30 million poor and oppressed peasants. landowners exported corn, and farmers eat carrion ash and dung of bread, which manifests itself at a meeting of the State Duma. In addition to land reform Stolypin, was featured in the June Third shot, which apparently Dmitry Medvedev and called for strengthening the Russian state as a whole. June 3, 1907 issued a manifesto to dissolve Duma and the change in the electoral rules established by the Government of Stolypin, reducing the representation of workers and peasants. Did not like him member of peasants and workers who sought to protect the interests of their constituents. Themselves the drafters of the Electoral Commission has called the reform of the electoral law "shameless." But the king, having heard the report of the Stolypin reform of the electoral law, adopted it, and smiled and said: "I am also shameless. Following the coup became Duma III more reactionary and more docile in the hands of the Romanovs and Stolypin, who helped carry out the agrarian reform in the interests of owners, has obtained the right to plunder the peasants. Back in the day today, you can really see the similarities of the reforms with the reforms of Stolypin. First, the same cuts shamelessly voting rights of the people, and, secondly, privatization of state assets in the interest of the party and the economic nomenklatura, landowners modern. Comparing reform Stolypin and contemporary transformations the last fifteen years on the content, the Stolypin reforms seems to be preferred. Stolypin broken feudal restrictions, paving the way for the capitalist mode of economic management, and this was their progressiveness. But reformers, reactionaries entirely, since monopoly capital left the developed (monopoly, forced to serve the people - which is socialism), the wild and unbridled capitalism, and therefore released all the evils of the capitalist economy, not not create something positive.
Vitaly Glukhov
The legacy of his father, he inherited an estate near Kaunas Kolnoberzhe, Arkady Dmitrievich Stolypin who won at cards, and remained for many years the principal residence of the family of Peter Stolypin . As Interior Minister Stolypin went further and issued a decree on martial courts, which decide cases of rebels, peasants revolted, the sentences were carried out within 24 hours. executions of peasants have continued even after that the Duma has rejected the decree on martial II because the military continued to operate the district courts.
Introduction Stolypin court martial has shocked not only the Social Democrats, but the entire liberal society. member of the Kadet party Rodichev Fedor, denouncing the Stolypin, called rope around his neck hung "Stolypin necktie." But he did not bother Stolypin. "First, the quiet - and then reform" - a strategy implemented Stolypin. The only sure way to calm the peasants Stolypin saw the widespread use of repression in military courts in murders demonstration. This reformer preaching Malthusian theory in Russian: the first lock, then, for those who stay, improve life. researchers' calculations, only eight months (August 1906-April 1907) in court martial in 1100 facing the death penalty. writer Vladimir Korolenko noted that during the period Stolypin's "executions were commonplace.
Council Stolypin, as head of government, had a point after the revolutionary reforms. They themselves were the product of the reform of the Russian bourgeois revolution of 1905, and not the result of "brilliant" insight Stolypin, when the Tsarist monarchy and owners within the government, it became evident that without reform land, without elimination of feudal obligations and servitude of the peasants, without reform of the state, authority does not hold. The
development of capitalism in agrarian relations, forced by the feudal relations, medieval land allocation and community relationships. community class, the peasants' attachment to land, the presence of large landholdings, with a tiny peasant plots did not increase the production of commodities do not meet the requirements of methods capitalist agriculture. Depletion and peasantry obezzemelivaniya, following the ruthless exploitation by landowners and officials, provoked a storm of protest, peasant revolts prompting more and more, the requirements of large estates. Fearing the arbitrary seizure estates by peasants, the government has decided to hold the land reform Stolypin, displacing some of the peasants in remote areas of Russia, part - by providing land acquisition and thus reducing the revolutionary wave. But Stolypin, coupled with the Romanovs and other landowners, sought to land reform is not in the interest of millions of peasants, and in the interests of 30,000 owners, having 70 million acres of land. peasants fought against feudalism, and they, along the plane of Stolypin, was conducted in remote and uninhabited margins and financial bondage. owners have received huge sums of state redemption, it is likely, according to Medvedev, who wanted to work, which took the initiative and enterprise, and farmers - the sand, long uninhabited frontier regions of Russia and huge debts. Here is the result of the Stolypin agrarian reforms praised. The agrarian question, serious problems during the revolution 1905, thanks to the reforms of Stolypin resolved in favor of large landholdings, not to the peasants, which led to an unprecedented famine in 1911, 30 million poor and oppressed peasants. landowners exported corn, and farmers eat carrion ash and dung of bread, which manifests itself at a meeting of the State Duma. In addition to land reform Stolypin, was featured in the June Third shot, which apparently Dmitry Medvedev and called for strengthening the Russian state as a whole. June 3, 1907 issued a manifesto to dissolve Duma and the change in the electoral rules established by the Government of Stolypin, reducing the representation of workers and peasants. Did not like him member of peasants and workers who sought to protect the interests of their constituents. Themselves the drafters of the Electoral Commission has called the reform of the electoral law "shameless." But the king, having heard the report of the Stolypin reform of the electoral law, adopted it, and smiled and said: "I am also shameless. Following the coup became Duma III more reactionary and more docile in the hands of the Romanovs and Stolypin, who helped carry out the agrarian reform in the interests of owners, has obtained the right to plunder the peasants. Back in the day today, you can really see the similarities of the reforms with the reforms of Stolypin. First, the same cuts shamelessly voting rights of the people, and, secondly, privatization of state assets in the interest of the party and the economic nomenklatura, landowners modern. Comparing reform Stolypin and contemporary transformations the last fifteen years on the content, the Stolypin reforms seems to be preferred. Stolypin broken feudal restrictions, paving the way for the capitalist mode of economic management, and this was their progressiveness. But reformers, reactionaries entirely, since monopoly capital left the developed (monopoly, forced to serve the people - which is socialism), the wild and unbridled capitalism, and therefore released all the evils of the capitalist economy, not not create something positive.
Vitaly Glukhov
0 comments:
Post a Comment