Thursday, March 3, 2011

Announcing New Doctor

dung, stoves and Flame Wrath

No - Utilities robbery

the hot summer months teacher Nellie Anatolyevna Pozdneyev brought from the service of housing and utilities account for water: 3000 rubles. It's almost her entire salary. There
reason to think, however, as any person working. On today's life in general and about "reform" of housing and communal services in particular. Why, and invites Vladimir Petrovich PUZY, which led to this fact. He is a member of the Bureau of Regional Committee of the Communist Party, deputy of the Legislative Assembly of Orenburg Region. Vladimir Petrovich knows it is better living overseas guidance "reformers". For several decades, he headed the largest farm, now a farm Producers Cooperative - farm them. YA Gagarin's Orenburg region. Not too big an exaggeration to say that such an enterprise - the State in the state, but his head is often in danger imagined himself as the Emperor, so vseohvaten range of his concerns.

It's not only the direct responsibility Head of a complex multi-industrial enterprise, but also daily custody of all the parties being residents of the village, starting from his birth, upbringing, education, health, and last but not least - the housing and communal services, which we're talking.
- Vladimir Petrovic, how do you assess what is happening in this industry?
- Like all the people: a robbery. And here is a robbery of the workers. This is for short words, simple people. But you can work together peacefully reflect. We lived in a socialist society that puts its mission of providing practical human rights. Including the right to housing: receive free, in a subsequent very small rents and with full coverage of housing and utility costs by the state.
Such costs gradually developed as a public consumption funds in all spheres of social life in Soviet society. They are in fact not only to ensure everyone a minimum subsistence level, which then do not say, because this problem for granted in such a way solved automatically.
social consumption funds have already met the minimum over the ever-growing needs of people, literally their lion the proportion that is well remembered for his life. And if you think about all the good count, it is easy to see that this was a very economical system, with the least the costs of its content, though with a very favorable moral-psychological climate, when not even the question arises as to how now, pay bribes at every step, for each certificate for execution by officials of their duties.
- theoretically and then we could raise the question of restructuring order of payment. Public consumption fund transfer to the private, to make appropriate additions to the salary to every man of his salary is fully covered housing and utility costs.

- And today in this setting, the question is not even discussed, though this can and should be housing and utilities reform, once the "Bears" and other turn their rods, break the country. "Market", and if no uncertain terms - Give them capitalism, and, therefore, down with this "relic socialism. "
But then for any simple zadachka Bazaar: liquidate the public fund - to distribute it to society, return the people money. That they themselves paid for housing.
However, the Fund liquidated, but its co-owners nor the ruble did not return. Simply
money from the people robbed. Like other "market reforms", "reform" Housing for workers is confiscatory and predatory nature. "Reform" several times the salary cut, and even from this reduced wages are forced to increase spending on housing up to their full coverage.
vast majority of people tightening their belts, many experiencing hardship, and many faced with a choice: flat or famine.

Meanwhile, the public fund of consumption does not melt like last year's snow. According to the laws of conservation of matter, it just goes from one pocket to another, for example, in the so-called Stabilization Fund. From there, he tells God to take away the money his masters - the working people.
- And a holy cause - the massive protests against unscrupulous increase utility bills.
- Communists first advocate for vital needs of workers, with examples from everyday life of each show bestial essence of capitalism, which stands for and create "reform."
And Communists in elected bodies are trying to measure the forces mitigate the "reforms" which they condemn in principle from the standpoint of the Communist Party.
After fifteen years of "democracy" in the housing and communal services, especially in the countryside, close to the disastrous state.
This is despite the inflated rates for services Housing in the formation of a unique and arbitrariness. To me it is especially striking because until the last years of the housing and communal services of our villages rested on the shoulders of the farm and just recently transferred to the balance of the municipality "Orenburg region.
Our farm them. Yuri Gagarin in his time built as agro with a full range of modern amenities. Central heating, water, sewerage in every farmhouse.
Cost Services evolved from its own self-cost and could not be overestimated - the system of calculating farm created an interest in frugality. According to the present law residents must pay the so-called cost-based tariffs. But what is the economic rationale if the utilities' charges a cubic meter of supplied water in the area Sorochinsko 3.58 rubles, and in the neighboring Grachevsky - 23.59 rubles? And this is roughly the same conditions.
characteristic that price anywhere in the cities is less than in villages. Below is a privileged suburban village near Orenburg (formerly Uchkhoz). Explain that here each house is meters.
Why not create conditions for the entire population? At our village caravan is not installed meter supplied water, as in other places. You can write any amount of that done.
- Have you checked the validity of tariffs for your village?

- checked. When I was a member of Orenburg District Council. Before New Year's administration has raised the question of approval of increased utility rates.
We (there were three Communist deputies) opposed the growth of high cost and suggested further study the formation of tariffs. Themselves considered them for the village Caravan. Price cubic meter of water obtained at most - 4 rubles. A district zhilkomhoz requires to pay 12.8 rubles. The Communists immediately demanded to put in water pipes in a caravan and others Rural counters. Director raykomhoza Neretin flatly refused: "Currently there are no meters in each apartment, there will be no total count for the village."
Clearly, that power itself is not interested in the precise accounting of housing and communal services. The same position in all its branches, also in the supply of heat, hot water and other services. Often do not find all.
Raising tariffs is ungrounded and provides a revenue growth of officials, managers. Where
eventually arrive in the country a rusty cart utilities, we can see in their village Caravan. For example, water for technological needs on the farm, we fed electrically.
With the growth in electricity tariffs abandoned. Switched on dung and wood - a technical progress! Worn to the limit of boiler, heating, plumbing, sewerage - plain village is doomed to drown in sewage.
People refuse to irrigation networks to irrigate vegetable gardens: in the summer requires a lot of water, yield does not pay off.
A case - an astronomical water bill teacher Nellie Anatolyevna Pozdneyev, from which we started today's conversation.
Attempts to irrigate vegetable gardens with salt water from wells in the courtyards of destroying the soil.
And this is not the limit. Under the new law on the division of housing and communal authorities Management transferred from district level to the balance of rural self-government, which has little of their income. This is a dead end. Will the output from it?

«Reformers" not think about it, they make the next step of passing utility costs to workers. Soon 100% payment for housing will make the common man from his miserable wages. He will be forced to give up the benefits are not available. Can not afford to heat the entire apartment, isolate one room.
were cases already return to home "stove" - is that they "has registered" in the apartments because of the high cost of central heating.
- most sensitive to ruling strata perceive risk to themselves: massive domestic social hypothermia causes overheating and even an explosion. And because they tend to produce pairs. Contrived system depressants meager handouts, hypocritically called the support of disadvantaged or vulnerable groups.
- At the recent parliamentary hearings have even members of the faction "United Russia" to recognize that 30% of the population unable today to pay utility bills. For the disadvantaged law provides subsidies, targeted benefits on poverty. However, these peanuts are often not beg.
expensive to prove their poverty. To form a noble: concern about a simple man, like a splinter of socialism. But in their own skin feel the difference. Through public fund worker satisfies their needs naturally as breathing, with dignity, equality to all, not even thinking about it.
And now, instead of respect - The humiliation, when created by his labor a man gets if he will make his stamp on his forehead that he is poor, underpaid, worse than others. And for this purpose "Democrats have to cut out as if turned inside out and trimmed to the wretched scrip is also a" foundation of public consumption "- the budget of" targeted subsidies for the poor. "
Finally, if you already thought up the housing and communal services to take on the inhabitants, it must first be honest to return to the industry backlog decade and a half debts when there is almost nothing has been done from the fact that earlier created as a fund public consumption. This is the same internal public debt, as debt at discounted savings deposits.
have a moral right and obligation to those actually existing debts to pay from the Stabilization Fund, which in their own ways they too settled.
should be restored on the basis of modern logistic base housing, for example, to pave plastic pipes, put in each apartment meters. And only then transfer utilities fully to the new procedure of payment through the purse of the consumer. All this is taken into account in economically sound program demand CPRF: housing and utility costs should not exceed 10% of total family income. Together we will achieve this.
moderated conversation Fedor Podolsky.

Orenburg region.

0 comments:

Post a Comment